Techno-economic comparison of DEMO power conversion systems

被引:5
作者
Syblik, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Vesely, Ladislav [1 ,3 ]
Stepanek, Jan [1 ]
Entler, Slavomir [1 ,4 ]
Dostal, Vaclav [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Dept Energy Engn, Tech 1902-4, Prague 16000, Czech Republic
[2] Natl Radiat Protect Inst SURO Vvi, Bartoskova 28, Prague 14000, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Ctr Adv Turbomachinery & Energy Res CATER, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[4] Czech Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Za Slovankou 3, Prague 8, Czech Republic
关键词
Fusion; PCS; Economics; SupercriticalCO2; SUPERCRITICAL CARBON-DIOXIDE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; CYCLE; NUCLEAR; PLANTS; S-CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.125
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The transition to low-carbon technologies lies in the support of modern energy sources, which are also represented by fusion power plants. One of the first fusion power plants will be the European Union DEMOnstration fusion power plant. Among the key attributes that influence the entire design of this power plant, belongs the power conversion system. In addition to the classic Rankine steam cycle, it is possible to use different cooling media, such as supercritical CO2 in the Brayton cycle. The advantages of supercritical CO2 are mainly in the compactness of the power conversion system, that is, lower investment costs for the entire power plant while maintaining the high efficiency of the entire power plant. The key question that can influence the choice of the power conversion system is the levelized cost of electricity. The direct cost of the supercritical CO2 cycles is lower compared to the Rankine steam cycles, in general. On the other hand, supercritical CO2 cycles for the DEMOnstration fusion power plant offer slightly lower efficiency (by approximately 1.5 percentage points), which negatively influences supercritical CO2 cycles levelized cost of electricity by 10 %-20 % against Rankine steam cycles. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2777 / 2786
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
Ahn, Yoonhan ;
Bae, Seong Jun ;
Kim, Minseok ;
Cho, Seong Kuk ;
Baik, Seungjoon ;
Lee, Jeong Ik ;
Cha, Jae Eun .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) :647-661
[2]   Exergoeconomic analysis of hybrid sCO2 Brayton power cycle [J].
Alenezi, A. ;
Vesely, L. ;
Kapat, J. .
ENERGY, 2022, 247
[3]  
Allam R.J., 2014, OIL GAS APPL ORGANIC, V3B
[4]   Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium low temperature geothermal sources - Part B: Techno-economic optimization [J].
Astolfi, Marco ;
Romano, Matteo C. ;
Bombarda, Paola ;
Macchi, Ennio .
ENERGY, 2014, 66 :435-446
[5]   Issues and strategies for DEMO in-vessel component integration [J].
Bachmann, C. ;
Arbeiter, F. ;
Boccaccini, L. V. ;
Coleman, M. ;
Federici, G. ;
Fischer, U. ;
Kemp, R. ;
Maviglia, F. ;
Mazzone, G. ;
Pereslavtsev, P. ;
Roccella, R. ;
Taylor, N. ;
Villari, R. ;
Villone, F. ;
Wenninger, R. ;
You, J. -H. .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2016, 112 :527-534
[6]   Pure and Pseudo-pure Fluid Thermophysical Property Evaluation and the Open-Source Thermophysical Property Library CoolProp [J].
Bell, Ian H. ;
Wronski, Jorrit ;
Quoilin, Sylvain ;
Lemort, Vincent .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (06) :2498-2508
[7]  
Brun K, 2017, WOODHEAD PUBL SER EN, P1
[8]   Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables [J].
Caputo, AC ;
Palumbo, M ;
Pelagagge, PM ;
Scacchia, F .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (01) :35-51
[9]   Power, power density and efficiency optimization for a closed cycle helium turbine nuclear power plant [J].
Chen, LG ;
Zheng, JL ;
Sun, FR ;
Wu, C .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (15) :2393-2401
[10]  
Dostal V., 2004, MIT-ANP-TR-100