Formal institutions, ICSID arbitration and firm performance: evidence from Latin America

被引:9
作者
Enriquez-Perales, Sarela [1 ]
Diego Garcia-Gomez, Conrado [2 ]
Maria Diez-Esteban, Jose [3 ]
Lizarzaburu Bolanos, Edmundo R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Dept Commercial Lab & Private Int Law, Ave Valle Esgueva 6, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Duques Soria Campus,Calle Univ S-N, Soria 42004, Spain
[3] Univ Burgos, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Pza Infanta Elena, Burgos 09001, Spain
[4] ESAN Univ, Alonso de Molina 1652, Lima, Peru
关键词
Formal institutions; ICSID; Arbitration; Firm performance; Latin America; PANEL-DATA; OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION; CORPORATE PERFORMANCE; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; NATIONAL CULTURE; GROWTH; TRANSITION; IMPACT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40821-022-00213-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes how a country's formal institutional quality impacts the performance of listed companies across different Latin American countries (namely, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Chile) and industries. Latin America provides a unique setting to address this question due to the region's high institutional instability. The sample consists of 571 large listed companies, with a total of 8576 observations, for the period 2004-2019. Results show that the quality of a country's formal institutions is positively related to firm performance, measured through two alternative variables (ROA and Tobin's Q). Additionally, countries that are signatories of the ICSID agreement provide companies with a more stable environment in which to do business, which ultimately has a positive impact on their performance. However, as the number of cases recorded before the ICSID increases, the relationship turns negative. The paper provides a more comprehensive understanding of formal institutions by considering six alternative governance dimensions. Moreover, international arbitration is found to be a substitute for formal institutions in Latin American countries.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 464
页数:36
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]  
Diez-Esteban JM., 2013, SPAN J FINANC ACCOUN, V42, P487
[32]  
Diez-Esteban JM., 2016, RES INT BUS FINANC, V9, P49
[33]   Institutions, trade, and growth [J].
Dollar, D ;
Kraay, A .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 50 (01) :133-162
[34]   INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS ON ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN POST-SOCIALIST TRANSITION: A DYNAMIC PANEL ANALYSIS [J].
Efendic, Adnan ;
Pugh, Geoff .
ACTA OECONOMICA, 2015, 65 (04) :503-523
[35]   Do Market-Supporting Institutional Characteristics Explain Firm Performance? Evidence from Emerging Markets [J].
Elango, B. ;
Lahiri, Somnath .
THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2014, 56 (02) :145-155
[36]  
Estrin S., 2011, The dynamics of entrepreneurship: evidence from the global entrepreneurship monitor data, P181
[37]  
Fach Gomez K., 2016, J WORLD INVEST TRADE, V17, P511, DOI [10.1163/22119000-12340001, DOI 10.1163/22119000-12340001]
[38]   International institutions and credible commitment of non-democracies [J].
Fang, Songying ;
Owen, Erica .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2011, 6 (02) :141-162
[39]  
Fogel Kathy., 2006, Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship
[40]  
Franck SusanD., 2005, UC DAVIS L REV, V12, P47