Establishing Research Priorities for Investigating Male Suicide Risk and Recovery: A Modified Delphi Study With Lived-Experience Experts

被引:5
作者
Bennett, Susanna [1 ]
Robb, Kathyrn A. [2 ]
Andoh-Arthur, Johnny [3 ]
Chandler, Amy [4 ]
Cleary, Anne [5 ,6 ]
King, Kylie [7 ]
Oliffe, John [8 ,9 ]
Rice, Simon [10 ,11 ]
Scourfield, Jonathan [12 ]
Seager, Martin [13 ]
Seidler, Zac [14 ]
Zortea, Tiago C. [1 ,15 ]
O'Connor, Rory C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Suicidal Behav Res Lab, Clarice Pears Bldg,Level 2,90 Byres Rd, Glasgow G12 8TB, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Canc Behav Res Grp, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Ghana, Dept Psychol, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, Geary Inst Publ Policy, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Sociol, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Turner Inst Brain & Mental Hlth, Clayton, Australia
[8] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Univ Melbourne, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Australia
[10] Orygen, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[11] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, Melbourne, Australia
[12] Cardiff Univ, Sch Social Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[13] Cofounder Male Psychol Sect British Psychol Soc, Saffron Walden, Essex, England
[14] Movember, Richmond, Vic, Australia
[15] Univ Oxford, Oxford Inst Clin Psychol Training & Res, Oxford, England
来源
PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITIES | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
male suicide; risk factors; research agenda; suicide prevention; Delphi; GENDER PARADOX; MENTAL-HEALTH; SEXUAL-ABUSE; PREVENTION; IDEATION; MASCULINITY; STRATEGIES; BEHAVIOR; CARE;
D O I
10.1037/men0000448
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study uses the Delphi expert consensus method to work with lived-experience experts and establish research priorities to advance our understanding of male suicide risk and recovery. Items for the Delphi were generated via findings from two recent quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews on male suicide, a comprehensive gray literature search, responses to a global survey on male suicide, and feedback from a panel of 10 international academic/clinical male suicide experts. A two-round Delphi study was conducted to gain consensus among 242 lived-experience experts representing 34 countries on 135 potential male suicide research questions. Panelists were asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale from should not be included to essential. Consensus was defined as 80% of respondents scoring an item as "essential" or "important." After two Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 87 items. The final questions were then grouped by the author team and expert academic/clinical panel into thematic clusters to create a 22-point agenda of research priorities. Like all methodologies, there are weaknesses to the Delphi method, not least that the experts employed in a Delphi study do not represent all experts on a topic. We note that many items that did not make it to the top of the research agenda related to minority experiences. All the questions prioritized in this agenda can be applied to different demographics. However, minority populations may require tailored Delphi's using expert panels drawn specifically from those groups. A final agenda of 22 research priorities was developed. Questions related to 10 thematic domains: (a) relationships with others, (b) relationship with self, (c) relationship with emotions, (d) mental health, (e) suicidal behaviors, (f) early-life experiences, (g) structural challenges, (h) cultural challenges, (i) at-risk groups, and (j) support and recovery. The three highest endorsed items related to loneliness and isolation (98%), feelings of failure (97%), and sources of stress and emotional pain (96%) for men who are suicidal.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 98
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Substance use and suicide among men in Ghana: A qualitative study [J].
Andoh-Arthur, Johnny ;
Hjelmeland, Heidi ;
Osafo, Joseph ;
Knizek, Birthe Loa .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (03) :1243-1255
[2]   Childhood maltreatment and adult suicidality: a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Angelakis, Ioannis ;
Gillespie, Emma Louise ;
Panagioti, Maria .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 49 (07) :1057-1078
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Men, suicide and society
[4]   The Evolutionary Puzzle of Suicide [J].
Aubin, Henri-Jean ;
Berlin, Ivan ;
Kornreich, Charles .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (12) :6873-6886
[5]  
Bennett S., 2023, Male suicide risk and recovery factors: A 20-year systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
[6]  
Bilsker D., 2011, British Columbia Medical Journal, V53, P529
[7]  
Bolster B., 2019, The palgrave handbook of male psychology and mental health, P439
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659]
[9]  
Bryan CraigJ., 2022, Rethinking Suicide: Why Prevention Fails, and How We Can Do Better, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190050634.001.0001
[10]   Suicide and Social Justice: Toward a Political Approach to Suicide [J].
Button, Mark E. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 69 (02) :270-280