COVID-19 adaptations to a training and support programme to improve primary care response to domestic abuse: a mixed methods rapid study

被引:0
作者
Downes, Lucy [1 ]
Barbosa, Estela Capelas [2 ]
机构
[1] IRISi, 10 Pk St, Bristol BS1 5HX, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PN, England
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Domestic abuse; Primary care; Training; Advocacy support; Mixed methods; COVID-19; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-023-02203-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundIncreased incidence and/or reporting of domestic abuse (DA) accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. National lockdowns and enforced social isolation necessitated new ways of supporting victims of DA remotely. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) is a programme to improve the response to domestic abuse in general practice, providing training for general practice teams and support for patients affected by DA, which has previously been proven effective and cost-effective [1-3]. The COVID-19 pandemic required the adaptation of the programme to online training and remote support.MethodsThis study is mixed methods rapid research, which aimed to gather evidence around the relevance, desirability and acceptability of IRIS operating remotely. Quantitative IRIS referral data were triangulated with data from four surveys and 15 interviews. Participants were local IRIS teams, IRIS-trained clinicians, and victim-survivors supported by IRIS services. The study was designed using the Lean Impact approach, allowing quick evaluation of innovation and the impact of social interventions. We carried out a framework analysis of the interviews, which is a qualitative methodology widely used in policy and applied research that enables research teams to move from descriptive accounts to a conceptual explanation of findings [4, 5].ResultsWe found that the adaptation to online training and support of IRIS was acceptable and desirable. Most clinicians felt confident addressing DA over the phone and online, although most were more confident face-to-face. While referrals to IRIS services initially declined in March 2020, numbers of referrals increased to pre-pandemic levels by July 2020. Patients felt well supported remotely, although patients who had previously experienced face-to-face support preferred it. Technology was the most frequently mentioned barrier to the change from face-to-face training and support to online training and remote support.ConclusionsThis study contributes to practice by asserting the desirability and acceptability of training clinicians to be able to identify, ask about DA and refer to the IRIS programme during telephone/online consultations. This is of relevance to health and public health commissioners when making commissioning decisions to improve the general practice response to domestic abuse.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, International Journal of Medical Sciences, P7
  • [2] [Anonymous], Responding to intimate partner. violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of a domestic violence and abuse training and support programme in primary care in the real world: updated modelling based on an MRC phase IV observational pragmatic implementation study
    Barbosa, Estela Capelas
    Verhoef, Talitha Irene
    Morris, Steve
    Solmi, Francesca
    Johnson, Medina
    Sohal, Alex
    El-Shogri, Farah
    Dowrick, Susanna
    Ronalds, Clare
    Griffiths, Chris
    Eldridge, Sandra
    Lewis, Natalia V.
    Devine, Angela
    Spencer, Anne
    Feder, Gene
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [4] Development of a practice framework for improving nurses' responses to intimate partner violence
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    Clark, Maria T.
    Parry, Jayne
    Taylor, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (15-16) : 2495 - 2502
  • [5] Domestic abuse awareness and recognition among primary healthcare professionals and abused women: a qualitative investigation
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    Taylor, Julie
    Kroll, Thilo
    Duncan, Fiona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2014, 23 (21-22) : 3057 - 3068
  • [6] Health consequences of intimate partner violence
    Campbell, JC
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) : 1331 - 1336
  • [7] COVID-19: a public health approach to manage domestic violence is needed
    Chandan, Joht Singh
    Taylor, Julie
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
    Kane, Eddie
    Bandyopadhyay, Siddhartha
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (06) : E309 - E309
  • [8] Female survivors of intimate partner violence and risk of depression, anxiety and serious mental illness
    Chandan, Joht Singh
    Thomas, Tom
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    Russell, Rebecca
    Bandyopadhyay, Siddhartha
    Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
    Taylor, Julie
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 217 (04) : 562 - 567
  • [9] Chang A.M., 2018, Lean impact: How to innovate for radically greater social good
  • [10] Adapting Service Delivery during COVID-19: Experiences of Domestic Violence Practitioners
    Cortis, Natasha
    Smyth, Ciara
    Valentine, Kylie
    Breckenridge, Jan
    Cullen, Patricia
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 51 (05) : 1779 - 1798