Refractive outcome and lens power calculation after intrascleral intraocular lens fixation: a comparison of three-piece and one-piece intrascleral fixation technique

PurposeTo evaluate the refractive prediction error of common intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae in patients who underwent intrascleral IOL fixation using two different techniques.MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized, longitudinal, single-site, single-surgeon study. Patients who underwent intrascleral IOL implantation using the Yamane or the Carlevale technique were followed up for a period of six months postoperatively. Refraction was measured using the best-corrected visual acuity at 4 m (EDTRS chart). Lens decentration, tilt and effective lens position (ELP) were assessed using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The prediction error (PE) and the absolute error (AE) were evaluated for the SRK/T, Hollayday1 and Hoffer Q formula. Subsequently, correlations between the PE and axial length, keratometry, white to white and ELP were assessed.ResultsIn total, 53 eyes of 53 patients were included in the study. Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients were in the Yamane group (YG) and 29 eyes of 29 patients were in the Carlevale group (CG). In the YG, the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q formulae resulted in a hyperopic PE (0.02 +/- 0.56 D, and 0.13 +/- 0.64 D, respectively) while in the SRK/T formula the PE was slightly myopic (- 0.16 +/- 0.56 D). In the CG, SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulae led to a myopic PE (- 0.1 +/- 0.80 D and - 0.04 +/- 0.74 D, respectively), Hoffer Q to a hyperopic PE (0.04 +/- 0.75 D). There was no difference between the PE of the same formulae across both groups (P > 0.05). In both groups the AE differed significantly from zero in each evaluated formula. The AE error was within +/- 0.50 D in 45%-71% and was within +/- 1.00 D in 72%-92% of eyes depending on the formula and surgical method used. No significant differences were found between formulae within and across groups (P > 0.05). Intraocular lens tilt was lower in the CG (6.45 +/- 2.03 degrees) compared to the YG (7.67 +/- 3.70 degrees) (P < 0.001). Lens decentration was higher in the YG (0.57 +/- 0.37 mm) than in the CG (0.38 +/- 0.21 mm), though the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.9996).ConclusionsRefractive predictability was similar in both groups. IOL tilt was better in the CG, however this did not influence the refractive predictability. Though not significant, Holladay 1 formula seemed to be more probable than the SRK/T and Hoffer Q formulae. However, significant outliers were observed in all three different formulae and therefore remain a challenging task in secondary fixated IOLs.