Pilot Study: Next-generation Sequencing of the Semen Microbiome in Vasectomized Versus Nonvasectomized Men

被引:8
|
作者
Arbelaez, Maria Camila Suarez [1 ]
Israeli, Joseph M. [1 ]
Tipton, Craig D. [2 ,3 ]
Loloi, Justin [4 ]
Deebel, Nicholas [5 ]
Leong, Joon Yau [6 ]
Ramasamy, Ranjith [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Desai Sethi Urol Inst, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] MicroGen DX, RTL Genom, Lubbock, TX USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Lubbock, TX USA
[4] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, The Bronx, NY USA
[5] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Salem, NC USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Seminal microbiome; Next-generation sequencing; Vasectomy; Dysbiosis; PELVIC PAIN SYNDROME; BACTERIAL-DNA; INFERTILE MEN; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Approximately half a million vasectomies are performed every year in the USA. There is a paucity of literature on the impact of male sterilization on the semen microbiome and whether it prompts microbiota dysbiosis.Objective: To investigate if vasectomy induces changes in the seminal microbiome via comparison of semen samples from men before and after vasectomy, and if the seminal microbiome profiles for vasectomized men follow a particular pattern with respect to diversity and abundance.Design, setting, and participants: From July 2021 to February 2022, we prospectively col-lected and analyzed semen samples from 58 men at one outpatient clinic. Eighteen men provided a semen sample before and 3 mo after vasectomy. We also collected semen samples from 22 fertile nonvasectomized men and from a further 18 vasectomized men at 3 mo after vasectomy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Semen microbiome a-diversity, beta-diversity, and relative abundance were compared initially between paired and then between unpaired vasectomized and nonvasectomized samples. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), permutational multivariate ANOVA, and analysis of the composition of micro-biomes with bias correction were used to assess differences.Results and limitations: In both paired and unpaired sets of samples, a decreasing trend for a-diversity in semen after vasectomy was observed. Shannon diversity, the relative abundance of species with an abundance >2%, and composition were not significantly changed. Sphingomonas, Brevundimonas, and Paracoccus abundance decreased after vasectomy, while Corynebacterium abundance increased. The results may be limited by the sample size and lack of demographic heterogeneity.Conclusions: Vasectomy is followed by a decrease in a-diversity and changes in the rel-ative abundance of bacterial species in the semen microbiome. Further investigation is necessary to understand the clinical significance of these changes after vasectomy. Patient summary: We evaluated changes in the bacteria species in semen after vasec-tomy. We found that vasectomy decreased the richness and evenness of bacteria species in semen, but the overall bacterial community remained similar. Further studies are needed to assess the implications of changes in semen bacteria after vasectomy.(c) 2022 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 82
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Understanding the Interactions between Human Papillomavirus and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome
    Cervantes, Jorge L.
    Hong, Bo-Young
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2013, 76 (04) : 195 - 202
  • [42] Clinical Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis
    Sabour, Leila
    Sabour, Maryam
    Ghorbian, Saeid
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (02) : 225 - 234
  • [43] Recent Advances in the Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing
    Ki, Chang-Seok
    PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY & NUTRITION, 2021, 24 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [44] Next-Generation Sequencing in the Mycology Lab
    Zoll J.
    Snelders E.
    Verweij P.E.
    Melchers W.J.G.
    Current Fungal Infection Reports, 2016, 10 (2) : 37 - 42
  • [45] The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics
    Rod Chiodini
    Ahmed Badr
    遗传学报, 2011, 38 (03) : 95 - 109
  • [46] Next-Generation Sequencing in Intellectual Disability
    Carvill, Gemma L.
    Mefford, Heather C.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GENETICS, 2015, 4 (03) : 128 - 135
  • [47] The emergence of nanopores in next-generation sequencing
    Steinbock, L. J.
    Radenovic, A.
    NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (07)
  • [48] Pseudouridylation meets next-generation sequencing
    Zaringhalam, Maryam
    Papavasiliou, F. Nina
    METHODS, 2016, 107 : 63 - 72
  • [49] The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics
    Zhang, Jun
    Chiodini, Rod
    Badr, Ahmed
    Zhang, Genfa
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 95 - 109
  • [50] Next-Generation Sequencing and Genome Editing in Plant Virology
    Hadidi, Ahmed
    Flores, Ricardo
    Candresse, Thierry
    Barba, Marina
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 7