Tree volume estimation with terrestrial laser scanning-Testing for bias in a 3D virtual environment

被引:20
作者
Abegg, Meinrad [1 ,3 ]
Bosch, Ruedi [2 ]
Kukenbrink, Daniel [2 ]
Morsdorf, Felix [3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Forest Resources & Management, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Land Change Sci, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Geog, Remote Sensing Labs, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Forest inventory; Simulation; Terrestrial laser scanning; Tree volume estimation; GROUND-BASED LIDAR; ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; DERIVATION; SIMULATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109348
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Tree volume is a key feature in forest monitoring, delivering information, such as wood availability or forest carbon balance. To date, tree volume, i.e. the total volume of the above ground woody parts of a tree, cannot be measured directly with conventional tools. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) offers the potential to directly measure tree volume. However, its application in forest monitoring requires a profound understanding of the precision and accuracy of retrieval approaches. In this study, we present a simulation environment for evaluating TLS application in forest inventories. We investigate the influence of understorey density, scanner placement and TLS sensor type on volume estimation of tree parts of varying diameters. Using information from 30 sample plots from the Swiss NFI to simulate 197 sample trees, we evaluate three understorey densities, five scanner locations and their combinations and three realistic and one hypothetic (geometric scanning) TLS sensor types. We show that tree volume estimates from point clouds are biased to certain extent: from about 25% for small trees to a few percent for larger trees above 40 cm diameter at breast height (DBH). Especially small tree parts (diameters < 7 cm) lack accurate and precise estimation. In small trees with 12 cm DBH they are overestimated by 110% in average with a high variation, whereas they are underestimated in large trees, i.e. with DBH >= 75 cm, by 50% in average. Volume estimation of small tree parts is subject to physical limits of TLS, however the estimation of volume of large tree parts could be feasible with appropriate TLS settings and field protocols. Nevertheless, tree volume estimation using TLS must be understood in greater depth before it can be applied regularly in forest inventories.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Impact of Beam Diameter and Scanning Approach on Point Cloud Quality of Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Forests
    Abegg, Meinrad
    Boesch, Ruedi
    Schaepman, Michael E.
    Morsdorf, Felix
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 59 (10): : 8153 - 8167
  • [2] Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Forest Inventories Tree Diameter Distribution and Scanner Location Impact on Occlusion
    Abegg, Meinrad
    Kuekenbrink, Daniel
    Zell, Juergen
    Schaepman, Michael E.
    Morsdorf, Felix
    [J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, VIERTES SCHWEIZERISC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, BLEND 3D MOD REND PA
  • [5] Binney J, 2009, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P3183
  • [6] Brassel P, 2001, Swiss National Forest Inventory, Methods and models of the second assessment
  • [7] Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: Comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR
    Brede, Benjamin
    Calders, Kim
    Lau, Alvaro
    Raumonen, Pasi
    Bartholomeus, Harm M.
    Herold, Martin
    Kooistra, Lammert
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 233
  • [8] Derivation of tree skeletons and error assessment using LiDAR point cloud data of varying quality
    Bremer, M.
    Rutzinger, M.
    Wichmann, V.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 80 : 39 - 50
  • [9] Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon
    Calders, Kim
    Adams, Jennifer
    Armston, John
    Bartholomeus, Harm
    Bauwens, Sebastien
    Bentley, Lisa Patrick
    Chave, Jerome
    Danson, F. Mark
    Demol, Miro
    Disney, Mathias
    Gaulton, Rachel
    Moorthy, Sruthi M. Krishna
    Levick, Shaun R.
    Saarinen, Ninni
    Schaaf, Crystal
    Stovall, Atticus
    Terryn, Louise
    Wilkes, Phil
    Verbeeck, Hans
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 251
  • [10] Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning
    Calders, Kim
    Newnham, Glenn
    Burt, Andrew
    Murphy, Simon
    Raumonen, Pasi
    Herold, Martin
    Culvenor, Darius
    Avitabile, Valerio
    Disney, Mathias
    Armston, John
    Kaasalainen, Mikko
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 6 (02): : 198 - 208