ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data

被引:12
作者
Hosseinzadeh, Pouya [1 ]
Nassar, Ayman [2 ]
Boubrahimi, Soukaina Filali [1 ]
Hamdi, Shah Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
streamflow prediction; machine learning; time series regression; upper colorado river basin; WATER-RESOURCES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FORECASTS; MODELS; PRECIPITATION; REGRESSION; ERROR; ARIMA; FLOW; DAM;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology10020029
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Streamflow prediction plays a vital role in water resources planning in order to understand the dramatic change of climatic and hydrologic variables over different time scales. In this study, we used machine learning (ML)-based prediction models, including Random Forest Regression (RFR), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Seasonal Auto- Regressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA), and Facebook Prophet (PROPHET) to predict 24 months ahead of natural streamflow at the Lees Ferry site located at the bottom part of the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) of the US. Firstly, we used only historic streamflow data to predict 24 months ahead. Secondly, we considered meteorological components such as temperature and precipitation as additional features. We tested the models on a monthly test dataset spanning 6 years, where 24-month predictions were repeated 50 times to ensure the consistency of the results. Moreover, we performed a sensitivity analysis to identify our best-performing model. Later, we analyzed the effects of considering different span window sizes on the quality of predictions made by our best model. Finally, we applied our best-performing model, RFR, on two more rivers in different states in the UCRB to test the model's generalizability. We evaluated the performance of the predictive models using multiple evaluation measures. The predictions in multivariate time-series models were found to be more accurate, with RMSE less than 0.84 mm per month, R-squared more than 0.8, and MAPE less than 0.25. Therefore, we conclude that the temperature and precipitation of the UCRB increases the accuracy of the predictions. Ultimately, we found that multivariate RFR performs the best among four models and is generalizable to other rivers in the UCRB.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [71] The Paroxysmal Precipitation of the Desert: Flash Floods in the Southwestern United States
    Smith, James A.
    Baeck, Mary Lynn
    Yang, Long
    Signell, Julia
    Morin, Efrat
    Goodrich, David C.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (12) : 10218 - 10247
  • [72] Seasonal to interannual ensemble streamflow forecasts for Ceara, Brazil: Applications of a multivariate, semiparametric algorithm
    Souza, FA
    Lall, U
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (11) : SWC11 - SWC113
  • [73] Forecasting at Scale
    Taylor, Sean J.
    Letham, Benjamin
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2018, 72 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [74] Employing long short-term memory and Facebook prophet model in air temperature forecasting
    Toharudin, Toni
    Pontoh, Resa Septiani
    Caraka, Rezzy Eko
    Zahroh, Solichatus
    Lee, Youngjo
    Chen, Rung Ching
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 52 (02) : 279 - 290
  • [75] Long-term runoff study using SARIMA and ARIMA models in the United States
    Valipour, Mohammad
    [J]. METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 22 (03) : 592 - 598
  • [76] Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir
    Valipour, Mohammad
    Banihabib, Mohammad Ebrahim
    Behbahani, Seyyed Mahmood Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 476 : 433 - 441
  • [77] Understanding Uncertainties in Future Colorado River Streamflow
    Vano, Julie A.
    Udall, Bradley
    Cayan, Daniel R.
    Overpeck, Jonathan T.
    Brekke, Levi D.
    Das, Tapash
    Hartmann, Holly C.
    Hidalgo, Hugo G.
    Hoerling, Martin
    McCabe, Gregory J.
    Morino, Kiyomi
    Webb, Robert S.
    Werner, Kevin
    Lettenmaier, Dennis P.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 95 (01) : 59 - 78
  • [78] Vaswani A, 2017, ADV NEUR IN, V30
  • [79] Evaluation of a physics-based distributed hydrologic model for flood forecasting
    Vieux, BE
    Cui, ZT
    Gaur, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) : 155 - 177
  • [80] Stock market index prediction using deep Transformer model
    Wang, Chaojie
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Shuqi
    Zhang, Qiuhui
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 208