Interprofessional Intervention to Reduce Emergency Department Visits in Black Individuals with Diabetes

被引:4
|
作者
Rovner, Barry W. [1 ,10 ]
Casten, Robin [2 ]
Chang, Anna Marie [3 ]
Hollander, Judd E. [3 ]
Leiby, Benjamin E. [5 ]
Nightingale, Ginah [6 ]
Pizzi, Laura [7 ]
Herres, Joseph [8 ]
White, Neva [9 ]
Kelley, Megan [4 ]
Rising, Kristin [3 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Neurol Psychiat & Ophthalmol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Pharmacol Physiol & Canc Biol, Div Biostat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Coll Pharm, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ, Ernest Mario Sch Pharm, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[8] Einstein Med Ctr Philadelphia, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] Jefferson Collaborat Hlth Equ, Jefferson Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Jefferson Hosp Neurosci, 900 Walnut St,Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Blacks; diabetes; emergency departments; clinical trial; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; HEALTH; CARE; ADULTS; OUTCOMES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1089/pop.2022.0216
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Black individuals with diabetes have high rates of emergency department (ED) use. This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of Diabetes Interprofessional Team to Enhance Adherence to Medical Care (DM I-TEAM) versus Usual Medical Care (UMC) to reduce number of return ED visits/hospitalizations over 12 months in 200 Black individuals with diabetes after an ED visit. DM I-TEAM consisted of community health worker-delivered diabetes education and behavior activation, telehealth visits with a diabetes nurse educator and primary care physicians, and clinical pharmacist recommendations to reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Secondary outcomes included glycemic control, PIMs use, diabetes self-management, diabetes self-efficacy, depression, and medical trust. Participants had a mean age of 64.9 years and 73.0% were women. The 2 treatment groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Sixty-eight (69.4%) DM I-TEAM participants and 69 (67.6%) UMC participants had at least 1 incident ED visit/hospitalization over 12 months. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for DM I-TEAM versus UMC was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.79-1.56; P = 0.54). DM I-TEAM participants attained significantly better diabetes self-management, diabetes self-efficacy, and institutional trust than UMC participants. There were no treatment group differences in hemoglobin A1c level nor PIMs use. Among Black individuals with diabetes, a novel culturally relevant intervention was no better than usual care at preventing return ED visits/hospitalizations over 1 year. Before reasonable clinical interventions such as DM I-TEAM can be effective, reducing system-level barriers to health, building community health care capacity, and designing interventions that better align with the everyday realities of patients' lives are necessary. clinicaltrials.gov NCT03393338
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 52
页数:7
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据