Service trade restrictiveness and foreign direct investment-Evidence from greenfield FDI in business services

被引:3
|
作者
Jungmittag, Andre [1 ,2 ]
Marschinski, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, DG Joint Res Ctr, C Inca Garciloso 3, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Frankfurt Univ Appl Sci, FB 3 Business & Law, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
WORLD ECONOMY | 2023年 / 46卷 / 06期
关键词
business services; count data models; foreign direct investment; gravity model; greenfield FDI; regulations; service trade restrictions; KNOWLEDGE-CAPITAL MODEL; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT; POLICY; GEOGRAPHY; GRAVITY; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1111/twec.13334
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We study the impact of service trade restrictions on bilateral greenfield FDI projects in four business services sectors within a gravity model framework. Project level FDI data for 43 destination countries and up to 41 source countries spanning the years 2014-2020 stems from the fDi Markets database and restrictions from the OECD's Service Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI). Using a negative binomial estimator to explain the number of bilateral FDI projects, we find that service trade restrictions represent a significant barrier for greenfield FDI. In three out of four business services, we obtain statistically significant evidence of a negative effect of the compound STRI level. Using three sub-components of the index (restrictions to foreign entry, restrictions to the movement of people, other service trade restrictions) generally improves the explanatory power of the models. To illustrate potential magnitudes, we simulate how the number of expected FDI projects would increase in response to a hypothetical policy reform reducing relevant restrictions by 50%. We find average increases across the destination countries ranging between 20% and 104%, with a strong dependence on which business service sector is considered and whether or not the FDI projects only involve countries of the European Economic Area (EEA).
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1758
页数:48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The political economy of foreign direct investment-Evidence from the Philippines
    Drope, Jeffrey
    Joy Chavez, Jenina
    Lencucha, Raphael
    McGrady, Beim
    POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 33 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [2] Foreign Direct Investment and Services Trade: Evidence from Malaysia and Singapore
    Wong, Koi Nyen
    Tang, Tuck Cheong
    Fausten, Dietrich K.
    GLOBAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 38 (03) : 265 - 276
  • [3] The significance of foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade openness: evidence from nine European economies
    Evans Yeboah
    Alexander Amo Baffour
    Haggai Chibale Chibalamula
    Francis Atiso
    SN Business & Economics, 5 (3):
  • [4] Foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental quality: Is greenfield FDI greener than mergers and acquisitions FDI?
    Dung, Ly-My
    Le, Thai-Ha
    Park, Donghyun
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2024, 47 (05): : 1827 - 1850
  • [5] Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Evidence from Bangladesh
    Qamruzzaman, Md
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 7 (10): : 97 - 105
  • [6] Foreign Direct Investment and Elections: The Impact of Greenfield FDI on Incumbent Party Reelection in Brazil
    Owen, Erica
    COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 52 (04) : 613 - 645
  • [7] Foreign direct investment and services trade - The case of Japan
    Fukao, K
    Ito, K
    TRADE IN SERVICES IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION, 2003, 11 : 429 - 480
  • [8] TRADE IN SERVICES AND RETURNS ON FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT
    RAMSTETTER, ED
    LEE, CH
    WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1989, 125 (02): : 375 - 385
  • [9] Services tradability, trade liberalization and foreign direct investment
    vanMarrewijk, C
    Stibora, J
    deVaal, A
    ECONOMICA, 1996, 63 (252) : 611 - 631
  • [10] Political uncertainty and foreign direct investment-Evidence from the government official vacancy in China's cities
    Cheng, Maoyong
    Yao, Yutong
    Meng, Yu
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2023, 31 (03) : 527 - 559