Micromechanical Models for FDM 3D-Printed Polymers: A Review

被引:18
作者
Bol, Rowin J. M. [1 ]
Savija, Branko [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Microlab, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
fused deposition modeling (FDM); additive manufacturing (AM); printing process parameters; mechanical anisotropy; inter-layer bond; intra-layer bond; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; PRE-DEPOSITION; STRENGTH; QUALITY; ABS; SIMULATION; FAILURE; PARTS;
D O I
10.3390/polym15234497
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Due to its large number of advantages compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing techniques, additive manufacturing (AM) has gained increasing attention and popularity. Among the most common AM techniques is fused filament fabrication (FFF), usually referred to by its trademarked name: fused deposition modeling (FDM). This is the most efficient technique for manufacturing physical three-dimensional thermoplastics, such that FDM machines are nowadays the most common. Regardless of the 3D-printing methodology, AM techniques involve layer-by-layer deposition. Generally, this layer-wise process introduces anisotropy into the produced parts. The manufacturing procedure creates parts possessing heterogeneities at the micro (usually up to 1 mm) and meso (mm to cm) length scales, such as voids and pores, whose size, shape, and spatial distribution are mainly influenced by the so-called printing process parameters. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate their influence on the mechanical properties of FDM 3D-printed parts. This review starts with the identification of the printing process parameters that are considered to affect the micromechanical composition of FDM 3D-printed polymers. In what follows, their (negative) influence is attributed to characteristic mechanical properties. The remainder of this work reviews the state of the art in geometrical, numerical, and experimental analyses of FDM-printed parts. Finally, conclusions are drawn for each of the aforementioned analyses in view of microstructural modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling [J].
Ahn, Daekeon ;
Kweon, Jin-Hwe ;
Kwon, Soonman ;
Song, Jungil ;
Lee, Seokhee .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 209 (15-16) :5593-5600
[2]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[3]   Influence of meso-structure and chemical composition on FDM 3D-printed parts [J].
Alaimo, Gianluca ;
Marconi, Stefania ;
Costato, Luca ;
Auricchio, Ferdinando .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2017, 113 :371-380
[4]   Interlayer adhesion and fracture resistance of polymers printed through melt extrusion additive manufacturing process [J].
Aliheidari, Nahal ;
Christ, Josef ;
Tripuraneni, Rajasekhar ;
Nadimpalli, Siva ;
Ameli, Amir .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2018, 156 :351-361
[5]   Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers [J].
Aliheidari, Nahal ;
Tripuraneni, Rajasekhar ;
Ameli, Amir ;
Nadimpalli, Siva .
POLYMER TESTING, 2017, 60 :94-101
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Stainless, Heat-Resisting, Maraging, and Other Similar Chromium-Nickel-Iron Alloys, DOI [DOI 10.1520/D0638-14, 10.1520/D0638-14]
[7]   Microscale representative volume element based numerical analysis on mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling components [J].
Anoop, M. S. ;
Senthil, P. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 39 :563-571
[8]   Simulation of edge quality in fused deposition modeling [J].
Armillotta, Antonio .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) :541-554
[9]  
ASTM, 2014, ASTM D1938-14
[10]  
ASTM, 2014, ASTM D5045-14