Relationship between team learning profiles and outcomes in team project-based learning: a cluster analysis

被引:7
作者
You, Ji Won [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Seongnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Team project-based learning; cluster analysis; learning outcomes; teamwork; task authenticity; instructor feedback; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; COLLECTIVE EFFICACY; CREATIVITY; FEEDBACK; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; ANTECEDENTS; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2023.2219298
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Team project-based learning has become increasingly common in higher education. This study aimed to characterise and understand students' team learning experiences in team project-based learning by considering various aspects, such as individual qualities, teamwork, task, and instructor support. K-means clustering analysis was performed using eleven variables: team learning preference, co-regulation, team efficacy, team climate, team trust, psychological safety, team interaction, perceived team loafing, task authenticity, the frequency of instructor feedback, and usefulness of instructor feedback. Data were collected from students who were involved in team project-based learning at a South Korean university in the 2nd semester of 2021, and 782 responses were used in the analysis. Consequently, six clusters were identified, each showing different patterns of individual team learning attitudes and skills, teamwork, task authenticity, and instructor feedback. Following the cluster analysis, one-way ANOVA was performed, finding significant differences in team performance and team learning satisfaction between clusters. Based on these findings, important factors in team learning are discussed, and implications of enhancing team project-based learning are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 32
页数:17
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]   Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice [J].
Nicol, DJ ;
Macfarlane-Dick, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) :199-218
[52]  
North A.C., 2000, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V20, P389, DOI [DOI 10.1080/01443410020016635, 10.108/01443410020016635]
[53]   Seven disagreements about cooperative learning [J].
Opdecam, Evelien ;
Everaert, Patricia .
ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2018, 27 (03) :223-233
[54]   Preferences for Team Learning and Lecture-Based Learning Among First-Year Undergraduate Accounting Students [J].
Opdecam, Evelien ;
Everaert, Patricia ;
Van Keer, Hilde ;
Buysschaert, Fanny .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 55 (04) :400-432
[55]   Reducing perceived social loafing in virtual teams: The effect of team feedback with guided reflexivity [J].
Penarroja, Vicente ;
Orengo, Virginia ;
Zornoza, Ana .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 47 (08) :424-435
[56]   Hybrid-PjBL: Learning Outcomes, Creative Thinking Skills, and Learning Motivation of Preservice Teacher [J].
Rahardjanto, Abdulkadir ;
Husamah ;
Fauzi, Ahmad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2019, 12 (02) :179-192
[57]   Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation [J].
Saab, Nadira ;
van Joolingen, Wouter ;
van Hout-Wolters, Bernadette .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2012, 7 (01) :7-23
[58]  
SCOTT SG, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P580, DOI 10.5465/256701
[59]   Focus on formative feedback [J].
Shute, Valerie J. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (01) :153-189
[60]   Collective Efficacy, Group Potency, and Group Performance: Meta-Analyses of Their Relationships, and Test of a Mediation Model [J].
Stajkovic, Alexander D. ;
Lee, Dongseop ;
Nyberg, Anthony J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (03) :814-828