Do environmental, social, and governance scores improve green innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese-listed companies

被引:22
作者
Zhang, Chunlian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Danni [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Trade, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Inst Technol, Water Econ & Water Rights Res Ctr, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Nanchang, Peoples R China
关键词
PRODUCT INNOVATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ECO-INNOVATION; MEDIATING ROLE; CORPORATE; RESPONSIBILITY; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0279220
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) has become a buzzword in investment circles as ecological damage and climate warming occur. ESG assessment is one of the important institutions of the green financial system, which plays a significant part in boosting corporate green development. We use the number of green patent applications and green patent citations to measure corporate green innovation and analyze the micro-green effects of the ESG score system using the panel fixed effects models, which means that we explore the impact of the ESG scores on corporate green innovation performance, the specific mechanism of this effect, and the asymmetry of this impact under different moderation effects by using Chinese listed A-shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010-2019 as our research sample. We find that ESG positively affects corporate green innovation; the higher the ESG evaluation, the more it improves firms' green innovation performance. The promotion effect is reflected quantitatively and qualitatively and remains valid after several robustness tests. In addition, the contribution of ESG to corporate green innovation is achieved through two main paths improving corporate investment efficiency and government-enterprise relations. Corporate black attributes inhibit the contribution of ESG to green innovation, while green attributes strengthen the contribution of ESG to green innovation performance. Our study demonstrates the importance of corporate participation in environmental, social, and governance practices for corporate green innovation, which is beneficial for achieving win-win environmental, social, and economic results. Furthermore, our research completes the research on the effects of corporate green performance and green finance. It can provide empirical references for promoting corporate green development and improving the ESG evaluation system.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure [J].
Adomako, Samuel ;
Tran, Mai Dong .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (04) :1695-1704
[2]   The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Leal-Millan, Antonio ;
Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) :4912-4917
[3]   The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which social responsible investment (SRI) and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion [J].
Alda, Mercedes .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 298
[4]   Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) [J].
Alkaraan, Fadi ;
Albitar, Khaldoon ;
Hussainey, Khaled ;
Venkatesh, V. G. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 175
[5]   The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies [J].
Atan, Ruhaya ;
Alam, Md. Mahmudul ;
Said, Jamaliah ;
Zamri, Mohamed .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 29 (02) :182-194
[6]   Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data [J].
Auer, Benjamin R. ;
Schuhmacher, Frank .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2016, 59 :51-62
[7]   Sustainable buyer-supplier relationship capability development: a relational framework and visualization methodology [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed ;
Vazquez-Brust, Diego .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 304 (1-2) :1-34
[8]   Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value [J].
Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei ;
Ertugrul, Mine ;
Gao, Lucia Silva .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 62
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   The power of ESG transparency: The effect of the new SFDR sustainability labels on mutual funds and individual investors [J].
Becker, Martin G. ;
Martin, Fabio ;
Walter, Andreas .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47