Partial Component Exchange of a Non-Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis is Associated With a Higher Complication Rate

被引:8
作者
Barham, David W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Edward
Hammad, Muhammed
Swerdloff, Daniel
Berk, Brittany D.
Chung, Eric
Clavell-Hernandez, Jonathan
Gross, Martin S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jenkins, Lawrence C.
Jones, James McAndrew
Kathrins, Martin N.
Lentz, Aaron C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schammel, Joshua
Selph, John P.
Simhan, Jay [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Welliver, Charles
Yafi, Faysal A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol Urol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Sect Urol, Lebanon, NH USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, 333 City Blvd West,Suite 2100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER; REVISION SURGERY; INFECTION; REPLACEMENT; RESERVOIR; BIOFILM; DEVICE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To describe the infectious and non-infectious complications in men undergoing Inflatable penile pros-thesis (IPP) revision with partial and complete component exchange for mechanical malfunction. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IPP revision. Men undergoing procedures for implant infection were excluded. Patients were divided into those who had complete exchange of the entire device or partial exchange of only one or 2 components. Infectious and non-infectious complications were compared between groups. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-eight men had complete exchange of the entire device and 85 had partial component exchange. Men undergoing partial exchange had a significantly higher infection rate (7.1% vs 2.2%, P = .031). The partial exchange group also was more likely to receive antifungals (51.8 vs 16.6%, P < .001), have a modified salvage washout (77.4 vs 60.2%, P = .004), and less likely to receive vancomycin and gentamicin (63.5 vs 83.7%, P < .001). Time to revision was sig-nificantly shorter in the partial exchange group (44.9 vs 168.2 months, P < .001). Mean follow-up was slightly longer in the complete exchange group (18.3 vs 13.0 months). In multivariable analy-sis, partial exchange surgery, vancomycin and gentamicin prophylaxis, modified salvage washout, and antifungal prophylaxis were no longer associated with postoperative infections. The partial exchange group had greater rates of non-infectious complications (21.2% vs 9.5%, P = .005) such as pump malfunction and tubing breakage. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing partial component revision had more infectious and non-infectious complica-tions. These findings suggest that partial component exchange increases complications in men undergoing IPP revision. UROLOGY 174: 128-134, 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 134
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure [J].
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Angermeier, Kenneth W. ;
Montague, D. K. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06) :2471-2473
[2]   Infection rates following urologic prosthetic revision without replacement of any device components compared to partial or complete device exchange: a single-center retrospective cohort study [J].
Campbell, Scott P. ;
Kim, Chris J. ;
Allkanjari, Armand ;
Aksenov, Leonid, I ;
Dionise, Zachary R. ;
Inouye, Brian M. ;
Lentz, Aaron C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 35 (08) :725-730
[3]   Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation [J].
Cayan, Selahittin ;
Asci, Ramazan ;
Efesoy, Ozan ;
Bolat, Mustafa Suat ;
Akbay, Erdem ;
Yaman, Onder .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (07) :1092-1099
[4]   Safety of the "Drain and Retain" Option for Defunctionalized Urologic Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs During Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery: 5-Year Experience [J].
Cefalu, Christopher A. ;
Deng, Xiangrong ;
Zhao, Lee C. ;
Scott, J. Francis ;
Mehta, Sandeep ;
Morey, Allen F. .
UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (06) :1436-1439
[5]   Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes [J].
Chierigo, Francesco ;
Capogrosso, Paolo ;
Deho, Federico ;
Pozzi, Edoardo ;
Schifano, Nicola ;
Belladelli, Federico ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Salonia, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (11) :1827-1833
[6]  
Dawn LE, 2017, SEX MED REV, V5, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.002
[7]   Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: A multicenter study [J].
Henry, GD ;
Wilson, SK ;
Delk, JR ;
Carson, CC ;
Wiygul, J ;
Tornehl, C ;
Cleves, MA ;
Silverstein, A ;
Donatucci, CF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) :89-92
[8]   An Outcomes Analysis of over 200 Revision Surgeries for Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Multicenter Study [J].
Henry, Gerard D. ;
Donatucci, Craig F. ;
Conners, William ;
Greenfield, Jason M. ;
Carson, Culley C. ;
Wilson, Steven K. ;
Delk, John ;
Lentz, Aaron C. ;
Cleves, Mario A. ;
Jennermann, Caroline J. ;
Kramer, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (01) :309-315
[9]   Isolated Infection of a Decommissioned Penile Prosthesis Reservoir with Actinomyces neuii [J].
Hsi, Ryan S. ;
Hotaling, James M. ;
Spencer, Elysia S. ;
Bollyky, Paul L. ;
Walsh, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (03) :923-926
[10]   Contemporary Revision Penile Prosthesis Surgery Is Not Associated with a High Risk of Implant Colonization or Infection: A Single-Surgeon Series [J].
Kava, Bruce R. ;
Kanagarajah, Prashanth ;
Ayyathurai, Rajinikanth .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05) :1540-1546