Directional distance functions data envelopment analysis method with endogenous direction for target setting

被引:1
作者
Chen, Lei [1 ]
Wang, Suhui [2 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; directional distance functions; target setting; endogenous mechanism; production frontier; CLOSEST TARGETS; DEA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2023.2272855
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The determination of reasonable improvement direction is the key difficulty of directional distance functions in data envelopment analysis target setting method, but there is no consensus direction determination method at present. This paper introduces the concept of minimizing the distance between decision-making units (DMUs) and production frontier for constructing a new endogenous mechanism of improvement direction, and the corresponding target setting method is constructed to setting target for DMUs, which is used to minimize the total projection distance between DMUs and their targets. In addition, the free direction and unit invariant of improvement direction are discussed for meeting the diverse needs of decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:1699 / 1710
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ando Kazutoshi, 2012, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, V55, P73
[2]   Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA [J].
Aparicio, Juan ;
Pastor, Jesus T. .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 :51-57
[3]   A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA [J].
Aparicio, Juan ;
Pastor, Jesus T. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 219 (17) :9142-9154
[4]   The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure [J].
Baek, Chulwoo ;
Lee, Jeong-dong .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2009, 49 (1-2) :265-275
[5]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[6]   Developing two dynamic Malmquist-Luenberger productivity indices: An illustrated application for assessing productivity performance of Indian banks [J].
Bansal, Pooja ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Mehra, Aparna ;
Gulati, Rachita .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 107
[7]   An alternative ranking of DMUs performance for the ZSG-DEA model [J].
Bouzidis, Thanasis ;
Karagiannis, Giannis .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 81
[8]   Holder distance function and measurement of technical efficiency [J].
Briec, W .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1999, 11 (02) :111-131
[9]   Operating efficiency in Chinese universities: An extended two-stage network DEA approach [J].
Chen, Ya ;
Ma, Xuanxuan ;
Yan, Ping ;
Wang, Mengyuan .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 6 (04) :482-498
[10]   Directional output distance functions: endogenous directions based on exogenous normalization constraints [J].
Faere, R. ;
Grosskopf, S. ;
Whittaker, G. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (03) :267-269