Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians

被引:9
作者
Eastwood, Kyle W. [1 ]
May, Ronald [1 ]
Andreou, Pantelis [2 ]
Abidi, Samina [2 ]
Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza [3 ]
Loubani, Osama M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax Infirm, Dept Emergency Med, Emergency Dept,Adm Off, 1796 Summer St,4Th Floor, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Comp Sci, NICHE Res Grp, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Needs-analysis; User-centered design; Emergency medicine; Survey;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) is recognized by emergency physicians (EPs) as an important technology that will affect clinical practice. Several AI-tools have already been developed to aid care delivery in emergency medicine (EM). However, many EM tools appear to have been developed without a cross-disciplinary needs assessment, making it difficult to understand their broader importance to general-practice. Clinician surveys about AI tools have been conducted within other medical specialties to help guide future design. This study aims to understand the needs of Canadian EPs for the apt use of AI-based tools.MethodsA national cross-sectional, two-stage, mixed-method electronic survey of Canadian EPs was conducted from January-May 2022. The survey includes demographic and physician practice-pattern data, clinicians' current use and perceptions of AI, and individual rankings of which EM work-activities most benefit from AI.ResultsThe primary outcome is a ranked list of high-priority AI-tools for EM that physicians want translated into general use within the next 10 years. When ranking specific AI examples, 'automated charting/report generation', 'clinical prediction rules' and 'monitoring vitals with early-warning detection' were the top items. When ranking by physician work-activities, 'AI-tools for documentation', 'AI-tools for computer use' and 'AI-tools for triaging patients' were the top items. For secondary outcomes, EPs indicated AI was 'likely' (43.1%) or 'extremely likely' (43.7%) to be able to complete the task of 'documentation' and indicated either 'a-great-deal' (32.8%) or 'quite-a-bit' (39.7%) of potential for AI in EM. Further, EPs were either 'strongly' (48.5%) or 'somewhat' (39.8%) interested in AI for EM.ConclusionsPhysician input on the design of AI is essential to ensure the uptake of this technology. Translation of AI-tools to facilitate documentation is considered a high-priority, and respondents had high confidence that AI could facilitate this task. This study will guide future directions regarding the use of AI for EM and help direct efforts to address prevailing technology-translation barriers such as access to high-quality application-specific data and developing reporting guidelines for specific AI-applications. With a prioritized list of high-need AI applications, decision-makers can develop focused strategies to address these larger obstacles.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Understanding better how emergency doctors work. Analysis of distribution of time and activities of emergency doctors: a systematic review and critical appraisal of time and motion studies [J].
Abdulwahid, Maysam Ali ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Turner, Janette ;
Mason, Suzanne M. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (11) :692-700
[2]   A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older Peo ple's Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation [J].
Anderberg, Peter ;
Eivazzadeh, Shahryar ;
Berglund, Johan Sanmartin .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05)
[3]   Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applied at the Point of Care [J].
Angehrn, Zuzanna ;
Haldna, Liina ;
Zandvliet, Anthe S. ;
Gil Berglund, Eva ;
Zeeuw, Joost ;
Amzal, Billy ;
Cheung, S. Y. Amy ;
Polasek, Thomas M. ;
Pfister, Marc ;
Kerbusch, Thomas ;
Heckman, Niedre M. .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
[4]   How artificial intelligence could transform emergency department operations [J].
Berlyand, Yosef ;
Raja, Ali S. ;
Dorner, Stephen C. ;
Prabhakar, Anand M. ;
Sonis, Jonathan D. ;
Gottumukkala, Ravi V. ;
Succi, Marc David ;
Yun, Brian J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (08) :1515-1517
[5]   Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey [J].
Blease, C. ;
Locher, C. ;
Leon-Carlyle, M. ;
Doraiswamy, M. .
DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 6
[6]   Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK [J].
Blease, Charlotte ;
Bernstein, Michael H. ;
Gaab, Jens ;
Kaptchuk, Ted J. ;
Kossowsky, Joe ;
Mandl, Kenneth D. ;
Davis, Roger B. ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12)
[7]  
Canadian Medical Association, 2018, SHAP FUT HLTH MED
[8]   Impact of accountability, training, and human factors on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Exploring the perceptions of healthcare practitioners in the US [J].
Choudhury, Avishek ;
Asan, Onur .
HUMAN FACTORS IN HEALTHCARE, 2022, 2
[9]   Artificial intelligence: radiologists' expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey [J].
Coppola, Francesca ;
Faggioni, Lorenzo ;
Regge, Daniele ;
Giovagnoni, Andrea ;
Golfieri, Rita ;
Bibbolino, Corrado ;
Miele, Vittorio ;
Neri, Emanuele ;
Grassi, Roberto .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (01) :63-71
[10]   Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey [J].
Doraiswamy, P. Murali ;
Blease, Charlotte ;
Bodner, Kaylee .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 102