Wearable sensor-based measures of step-up transfers are supplementary to patient-reported outcome measures following total joint arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Ponds, N. H. M. [1 ,6 ]
Landman, E. B. M. [1 ]
Whitehouse, M. R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Blom, A. W. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Grimm, B. [5 ]
Bolink, S. A. A. N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Deventer Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Deventer, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bristol Sch Med, Musculoskeletal Res Unit, Bristol, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr, Bristol, England
[5] Luxembourg Inst Hlth, Dept Human Mot, Orthopaed, Sports Med,Digital Methods HOSD, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[6] Deventer Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nico Bolkensteinlaan 75, NL-7416 SE Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
Arthroplasty; outcome assessment; performance-based test; patient reported outcome measures; WOMAC; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PERFORMANCE-BASED TESTS; SIT-STAND TRANSFERS; KNEE-ARTHROPLASTY; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; UTILIZATION RATES; GAIT ANALYSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SCORE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2023.2219066
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study investigated the longitudinal assessment of step-up performance in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and correlation with subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).MethodsIn this sub-analysis of the ADAPT study, PROMs were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Block step-up (BS) transfers were assessed by wearable-derived measures of time. 76 patients undergoing TJA were included. Subgroups were formed isolating the worst performing quartile (low functioning (LF)) from the high functioning (HF), and outcomes were compared-ResultsOne-year post-surgery, WOMAC function demonstrated strong correlations to WOMAC pain (Pearson's r = 0.67-0.84) and moderate correlations to BS performance (Pearson's r = 0.31-0.54). Both WOMAC and BS significantly improved with a larger effect size for the HF subgroup (0.62 vs. 0.43; p < 0.05). Patients designated to the LF subgroup at 3 months had increased odds of representing the LF subgroup at 12 months (WOMAC = 19; BS = 4). WOMAC defined 18 LF patients at 12 months follow-up. BS performance identified 9 additional LF patients.ConclusionsWOMAC function scores seem pain dominated. Measures of BS performance allow assessment of otherwise hidden residual functional impairment. Lower functioning 3 months post-surgery is predictive of longer-term impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:2251 / 2258
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of physical function following total hip arthroplasty: Inertial sensor based gait analysis is supplementary to patient-reported outcome measures
    Bolink, S. A. A. N.
    Lenguerrand, E.
    Brunton, L. R.
    Wylde, V.
    Gooberman-Hill, R.
    Heyligers, I. C.
    Blom, A. W.
    Grimm, B.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 32 : 171 - 179
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures are not a Valid Proxy for Patient Satisfaction in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Halawi, Mohamad J.
    Jongbloed, Walter
    Baron, Samuel
    Savoy, Lawrence
    Cote, Mark P.
    Lieberman, Jay R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (02) : 335 - 339
  • [3] Patient-reported outcome measures versus inertial performance-based outcome measures: A prospective study in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
    Bolink, S. A. A. N.
    Grimm, B.
    Heyligers, I. C.
    KNEE, 2015, 22 (06) : 618 - 623
  • [4] Optimal Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Lee, Anderson
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Durst, Caleb R.
    Debbi, Eytan M.
    Rajaee, Sean S.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [5] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
    Karimijashni, Motahareh
    Abbasalipour, Shokoofih
    Westby, Marie
    Ramsay, Tim
    Beaule, Paul E.
    Poitras, Stephane
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025, : 1195 - 1209
  • [6] Responsiveness of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients
    SooHoo, Nelson F.
    Li, Zhongmin
    Chenok, Kate E.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (02) : 176 - 191
  • [7] Stepping Up Recovery: Integrating Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Wearable Technology for Rehabilitation Following Knee Arthroplasty
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Huffman, Nickelas
    Klika, Alison
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.
    Deren, Matthew E.
    Murray, Trevor G.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (10) : 757 - 763
  • [8] How to Raise the Bar in the Capture of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Rullan, Pedro J.
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Zhang, Chao
    Klika, Alison K.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (10) : 879 - 890
  • [9] Predicting Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Role of Preoperative Patient-Reported Measures
    Weber, Markus
    Zeman, Florian
    Craiovan, Benjamin
    Thieme, Max
    Kaiser, Moritz
    Woerner, Michael
    Grifka, Joachim
    Renkawitz, Tobias
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [10] Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement
    Baker, P. N.
    Petheram, T.
    Jameson, S. S.
    Avery, P. J.
    Reed, M. R.
    Gregg, P. J.
    Deehan, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (07): : 919 - 927