An improved method for computing acoustic ray incident angle based on secant method

被引:3
作者
Liu, Yangfan [1 ]
Xu, Tianhe [1 ]
Wang, Junting [1 ]
Li, Mowen [1 ]
Mu, Dapeng [1 ]
Gao, Zhaorui [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Space Sci, Weihai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Underwater acoustic positioning; Acoustic ray correction; Constant gradient acoustic ray tracking; Acoustic ray incident angle; Secant method; Iterative computation; PRECISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109293
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Constant gradient acoustic ray tracking is usually used in high-precision underwater acoustic positioning. However, it needs to calculate the incident angle of the acoustic ray, and the traditional incident angle computation method is very inefficient. To resolve this problem, we propose an improved acoustic ray incident angle iterative computation method. It firstly constructs the mathematical model for incident angle by using the function between horizontal propagation distance and incident angle based on secant method. The initial value of the incident angle is then determined by the incident angle calculated from the previous epoch and the last iteration. Meanwhile, the root-containing interval of the incident angle is reduced according to experimental parameters and coordinate correction values. Finally, the incident angle calculated in the last iteration is directly used for acoustic ray tracking and positioning solution until the end, when the coordinate correction values reach a threshold. Experiment conducted on the simulation cases demonstrates that the positioning calculation time of the proposed method is 77.7%, 77.1% and 88.1% lower than traditional methods in order of the dichotomy, secant method, and Newton method, respectively. As for the real experiment of the South China Sea, the computation effi-ciency improvement of the proposed method is about 62.9%, 67.6% and 66.1% compared with the dichot-omy, secant method, and Newton method respectively. These results suggest that the proposed method can significantly improve the positioning calculation efficiency without loss of positioning accuracy com-pared with conventional methods.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] On the Secant method
    Argyros, I. K.
    Khattri, S. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPLEXITY, 2013, 29 (06) : 454 - 471
  • [2] Acoustic Ray-Trace Equations for Seafloor Geodesy
    Chadwell, C. David
    Sweeney, Aaron D.
    [J]. MARINE GEODESY, 2010, 33 (2-3) : 164 - 186
  • [3] Travel-time approximation of acoustic ranging in GPS/Acoustic seafloor geodesy
    Chen, Hsin-Hung
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2014, 84 : 133 - 144
  • [4] Accuracy assessment of GPS/Acoustic positioning using a Seafloor Acoustic Transponder System
    Chen, Hsin-Hung
    Wang, Chau-Chang
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (13) : 1472 - 1479
  • [5] Seafloor geodesy from repeated sidescan sonar surveys
    DeSanto, John B.
    Sandwell, David T.
    Chadwell, C. David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (07) : 4800 - 4813
  • [6] Hertweck T, 2020, J SEISM EXPLOR, V29, P527
  • [7] Effect of ocean sound speed uncertainty on matched-field geoacoustic inversion
    Huang, Chen-Fen
    Gerstoft, Peter
    Hodgkiss, William S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 123 (06) : EL162 - EL168
  • [8] Jain D, 2017, J INTERDISCIP MATH, V20, P417, DOI 10.1080/09720502.2015.1033845
  • [9] Li S, 2015, RES METHOD SOUND SPE
  • [10] Liu B, 2010, PRINCIPLE UNDERWATER