Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature

被引:33
作者
Caloffi, Annalisa [1 ]
Colovic, Ana [2 ]
Rizzoli, Valentina [3 ]
Rossi, Federica [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
[2] NEOMA Business Sch, Mont St Aignan, France
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ London, London, England
关键词
Innovation intermediaries; Computational literature review; Open innovation intermediaries; Innovation system intermediaries; Transition intermediaries; Cluster intermediaries; KIBS; Incubators; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES; SCIENCE PARKS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; INDUSTRY; COLLABORATION; INCUBATORS; KIBS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122351
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation intermediaries have become numerous and diverse. Faced with this growing heterogeneity, there is the need to advance understanding of the organisations that engage in innovation intermediation activities. To do so, we use a combination of text mining and bibliometric techniques, and we identify seven different streams of literature, six of which refer to distinct types of intermediaries that perform specific functions and often involve specific types of organisations. Looking at the evolution of the different streams of literature over time, we find that the early contributions focused on university incubators, science and technology parks, and the role they play within different types of innovation systems. More recently, the focus has shifted to the role of intermediaries in supporting sustainable transitions. Despite the differences between the various types of intermediaries and the literature streams that analyse them, the bibliographic coupling shows that all strands of literature have a common theoretical basis, which includes the open innovation approach and revolves around the role of science parks and incubators.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Open Innovation in Medical and Pharmaceutical Research: A Literature Landscape Analysis [J].
Yeung, Andy Wai Kan ;
Atanasov, Atanas G. ;
Sheridan, Helen ;
Klager, Elisabeth ;
Eibensteiner, Fabian ;
Voelkl-Kernsock, Sabine ;
Kletecka-Pulker, Maria ;
Willschke, Harald ;
Schaden, Eva .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 11
[32]   The Role of Culture in Open Innovation Processes Through Intermediaries: Towards a Theoretical Framework [J].
Aquilani, Barbara ;
Abbate, Tindara ;
Codini, Anna .
IFKAD 2015: 10TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: CULTURE, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CONNECTING THE KNOWLEDGE DOTS, 2015, :1237-1249
[33]   Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation [J].
De Silva, Muthu ;
Howells, Jeremy ;
Meyer, Martin .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (01) :70-87
[34]   Overcoming cultural barriers in open innovation processes through intermediaries: a theoretical framework [J].
Aquilani, Barbara ;
Abbate, Tindara ;
Codini, Anna .
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2017, 15 (03) :447-459
[35]   Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis [J].
Dziallas, Marisa ;
Blind, Knut .
TECHNOVATION, 2019, 80-81 :3-29
[36]   Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries [J].
Colovic, Ana ;
Caloffi, Annalisa ;
Rossi, Federica ;
Russo, Margherita .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2025, 54 (01)
[37]   The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes [J].
Gassmann, Oliver ;
Daiber, Michael ;
Enkel, Ellen .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (05) :457-469
[39]   The role of intermediaries in nurturing innovation ecosystems: a case study of Singapore's manufacturing sector [J].
Ng, Huey Yuen ;
Luo, Yining ;
Park, Hyunkyu .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (03) :382-397
[40]   Effect of different types of knowledge intensive business services on innovation and performance [J].
Mendoza, Marlene ;
Molina, Luis M. ;
Ortega-Egea, M. Teresa .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2025, 210