Probabilistic estimation of the dynamic response of high-rise buildings via transfer functions

被引:2
作者
Tirado-Gutierrez, Rodolfo J. [1 ]
Vargas-Alzate, Yeudy F. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Drigo, Ramon [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Catalonia UPC, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Jordi Girona 1-3, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Polytech Univ Catalonia UPC, Dept Struct Engn, Jordi Girona 1-3, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
Transfer functions; Non-linear dynamic analysis; Spectral analysis; Fragility curves; Reliability;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117299
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The significant number of seismic ground motion records to be considered when designing or assessing civil structures is a common restriction for employing advanced nonlinear dynamic methods. This is because the large computational time involved in the calculation of the nonlinear dynamic response of complex multi-degree-of-freedom systems. There are several strategies to overcome this limitation; however, the reliability estimation of the analyzed systems can be compromised. This research is focused on developing a methodology to achieve a probabilistic and reliable estimation of the seismic response of buildings by tackling the computational effort. To do so, a set of transfer functions extracted from the dynamic response of three building models have been obtained. Then, an optimal transfer function per building is identified as the one maximizing the prediction of engineering demand parameters (EDPs), when each structure is subjected to a large set of ground motions records. Results show that the response of a reduced number of records allows developing an enhanced strategy to obtain reliable results in terms of the main statistical moments of the EDPs. This increased capacity to analyze complex systems in an affordable time has important consequences in the identification of optimal designs in terms of the material-performance ratio, as well as in the estimation of expected seismic risk.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]  
Estekanchi HE, Endurance time method for seismic analysis and design of structures
[22]   Analysis in Seismic Provisions for Buildings: Past, Present and Future [J].
Fajfar, Peter .
RECENT ADVANCES IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING IN EUROPE, 2018, 46 :1-49
[23]  
Fung T., 2003, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, V5, P167
[24]   Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure [J].
Han, Sang Whan ;
Chopra, Anil K. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (15) :1853-1873
[25]   Fragility functions for code complying RC frames via best correlated IM-EDP pairs [J].
Hancilar, Ufuk ;
Cakti, Eser .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (11) :3381-3400
[26]  
Haselton C.B., 2012, P 15 WORLD C EARTHQU
[27]   Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adiyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes [J].
Isik, Ercan ;
Avcil, Fatih ;
Arkan, Enes ;
Buyuksarac, Aydin ;
Izol, Rabia ;
Topalan, Mustafa .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2023, 151
[28]   Bayesian Cloud Analysis: efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression [J].
Jalayer, Fatemeh ;
De Risi, Raffaele ;
Manfredi, Gaetano .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (04) :1183-1203
[29]   3D seismic tomography in the seismic nest of Bucaramanga (Colombia) [J].
Jullyette Sepulveda-Jaimes, Francia ;
Henry Cabrera-Zambrano, Francisco .
BOLETIN DE GEOLOGIA, 2018, 40 (02) :15-33
[30]   Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? [J].
Kiureghian, Armen Der ;
Didevsen, Ove .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (02) :105-112