Cochlear implantation impact on health service utilisation and social outcomes: a systematic review

被引:5
作者
Okuba, Tolesa Bekele [1 ]
Lystad, Reidar P. [1 ]
Boisvert, Isabelle [2 ]
Mcmaugh, Anne [3 ]
Moore, Robyn Cantle [4 ]
Walsan, Ramya [1 ]
Mitchell, Rebecca J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Fac Arts, Macquarie Sch Educ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] NextSense Inst, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Cochlear implants; Health service utilisation; Social outcomes; Adults; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEARING-LOSS; OLDER-ADULTS; SHORT-FORM; INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES; WORKING PERFORMANCE; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; PATIENT BENEFIT; DEAF ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09900-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Hearing loss can have a negative impact on individuals' health and engagement with social activities. Integrated approaches that tackle barriers and social outcomes could mitigate some of these effects for cochlear implants (CI) users. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the impact of a CI on adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched from 1st January 2000 to 16 January 2023 and May 2023. Articles that reported on health service utilisation or social outcomes post-CI in adults aged >= 18 years were included. Health service utilisation includes hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, general practitioner (GP) visits, CI revision surgery and pharmaceutical use. Social outcomes include education, autonomy, social participation, training, disability, social housing, social welfare benefits, occupation, employment, income level, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), communication and cognition. Searched articles were screened in two stages. by going through the title and abstract then full text. Information extracted from the included studies was narratively synthesised. Results There were 44 studies included in this review, with 20 (45.5%) cohort studies, 18 (40.9%) cross-sectional and six (13.6%) qualitative studies. Nine studies (20.5%) reported on health service utilisation and 35 (79.5%) on social outcomes. Five out of nine studies showed benefits of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation including reduced use of prescription medication, reduced number of surgical and audiological visits. Most of the studies 27 (77.1%) revealed improvements for at least one social outcome, such as work or employment 18 (85.7%), social participation 14 (93.3%), autonomy 8 (88.9%), education (all nine studies), perceived hearing disability (five out of six studies) and income (all three studies) post-CI. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusions This review identified beneficial impacts of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. Improvement in hearing enhanced social interactions and working lives. There is a need for large scale, well- designed epidemiological studies examining health and social outcomes post-CI.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 142 条
[91]  
McKee Michael M, 2015, FP Essent, V434, P24
[92]   Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities [J].
McRackan, Theodore R. ;
Bauschard, Michael ;
Hatch, Jonathan L. ;
Franko-Tobin, Emily ;
Droghini, H. Richard ;
Nguyen, Shaun A. ;
Dubno, Judy R. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (04) :982-990
[93]   Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures [J].
McRackan, Theodore R. ;
Bauschard, Michael ;
Hatch, Jonathan L. ;
Franko-Tobin, Emily ;
Droghini, Harris Richard ;
Velozo, Craig A. ;
Nguyen, Shaun A. ;
Dubno, Judy R. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01) :29-36
[94]   Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument [J].
McRackan, Theodore R. ;
Velozo, Craig A. ;
Holcomb, Meredith A. ;
Camposeo, Elizabeth L. ;
Hatch, Jonathan L. ;
Meyer, Ted A. ;
Lambert, Paul R. ;
Melvin, Cathy L. ;
Dubno, Judy R. .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2017, 143 (10) :975-982
[95]   Cognitive Improvement After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults With Severe or Profound Hearing Impairment: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Controlled, Multicenter Study [J].
Mertens, Griet ;
Andries, Ellen ;
Claes, Annes J. ;
Topsakal, Vedat ;
Van de Heyning, Paul ;
Van Rompaey, Vincent ;
Calvino, Miryam ;
Cuadrado, Isabel Sanchez ;
Munoz, Elena ;
Gavilan, Javier ;
Bienkowska, Katarzyna ;
Swierniak, Weronika ;
Skarzynski, Piotr Henryk ;
Skarzynski, Henryk ;
Tapper, Lynne ;
Killan, Catherine ;
Ridgwell, Jillian ;
McGowan, Janet ;
Raine, Christopher ;
Tavora-Vieira, Dayse ;
Marino, Roberta ;
Acharya, Aanand ;
Lassaletta, Luis .
EAR AND HEARING, 2021, 42 (03) :606-614
[96]   HEARING LOSS IS ASSOCIATED WITH POORER RATINGS OF PATIENT-PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION AND HEALTHCARE QUALITY [J].
Mick, Paul ;
Foley, Danielle M. ;
Lin, Frank R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2014, 62 (11) :2207-2209
[97]   Cochlear implants and quality of life:: A prospective study [J].
Mo, B ;
Lindbæk, M ;
Harris, S .
EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (02) :186-194
[98]   Cochlear implants and health status:: A comparison with other hearing-impaired patients [J].
Mo, B ;
Harris, S ;
Lindbæk, M .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 113 (11) :914-921
[99]   The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants [J].
Moberly, Aaron C. ;
Bates, Chelsea ;
Harris, Michael S. ;
Pisoni, David B. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (10) :1522-1528
[100]   Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity" [J].
Moberly, Aaron C. ;
Lowenstein, Joanna H. ;
Nittrouer, Susan .
EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (01) :14-26