On the fringes of metaphor: Using ambiguously figurative vague language to pragmatically negotiate sensitive topics in the English as a Medium of Instruction classroom

被引:2
作者
Littlemore, Jeannette [1 ]
V. Fielden-Burns, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept English Language & Linguist, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Extremadura, Teaching Training Coll, Extremadura, Spain
关键词
Metaphor; Metonymy; Vague language; Sensitive topics; English as a medium of instruction; L2; users; METONYMY; COMPETENCE; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.016
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
When negotiating sensitive and taboo topics language needs to be used carefully so as not to cause offence or disrupt the interlocutors' relationship. One way to do this is through the use of vague language. In this study, we provide an in-depth, qualitative analysis of vague, euphemistic language, which may be perceived as marginally 'figurative', that is used to negotiate taboo and sensitive topics concerning culture, immigration, race and class. We use the term figurative to include metaphor and metonymy. The paper's focus is on lin-guistic strategies that employ content words which are in turn, ambiguously figurative, vague and de-emphasising, as well as emphatic qualifiers, and hedging signals, that dis-tance the speaker from their words or prepare the listener for figurative language to come, as tuning devices. The data used in the study are from the METCLIL (Alejo-Gonzalez et al., 2021) corpus and comprise two classes of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) stu-dents in Sweden studying international marketing in a post-graduate program. After a detailed discourse analysis, we show how L2 users exploit the vagueness inherent in ambiguously figurative language (i.e. language that we perceive to be "on the fringes of metaphor") to discuss complex topics in a pragmatically sensitive manner in ways that expand previously established categories for VL and collapse others.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Soler EA, 2008, SECOND LANG ACQUIS, V30, P3
[2]  
Alejo-Gonzalez Rafael, 2021, METCLIL CORPUS V1
[3]   A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners [J].
Allami, Hamid ;
Naeimi, Amin .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2011, 43 (01) :385-406
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Metonymy in Language and Thought, DOI DOI 10.1075/HCP.4.03RAD
[5]   Metonymic inferencing and second language acquisition [J].
Barcelona, Antonio .
AILA REVIEW, 2010, 23 (01) :134-154
[6]   Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery [J].
Barnden, John A. .
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2010, 21 (01) :1-34
[7]  
Bialostok S., 2002, Linguistics and Education, V13, P347
[8]   The career of metaphor [J].
Bowdle, BF ;
Gentner, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (01) :193-216
[9]   Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse [J].
Cameron, L ;
Deignan, A .
METAPHOR AND SYMBOL, 2003, 18 (03) :149-160
[10]  
Cameron L., 2012, Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations, DOI [10.4324/9780203837771, DOI 10.4324/9780203837771]