Postural Changes in Spinal Cord Stimulation Thresholds: Current and Voltage Sources

被引:2
作者
North, Richard B. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Sung, Jung H. [3 ]
Matthews, Liam A. [4 ,5 ]
Zander, Hans J. [4 ,5 ]
Lempka, Scott F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Neuromodulat Fdn Inc, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg & Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Biointerfaces Inst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] 1100 Copper Hill Rd, Baltimore, MD 21209 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2024年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
Chronic pain; electric stimulation; neuromodulation; neuropathic pain; spinal cord stimulation; POSITION; PAIN; NEUROSTIMULATION; SUPERIORITY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2023.08.006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) thresholds are known to change with body position; however, these changes have not been fully characterized for both "constant-voltage" and "constant-current" pulse generators. This study aimed to evaluate and quantify changes in psychophysical thresholds resulting from postural changes that may affect both conventional paresthesiabased SCS and novel paresthesia-free SCS technologies. Materials and Methods: We measured perceptual, usage, and discomfort thresholds in four body positions (prone, supine, sitting, standing) in 149 consecutive patients, with temporary lower thoracic percutaneous epidural electrodes placed for treating persistent low back and leg pain. We trialed 119 patients with constant-voltage stimulators and 30 patients with constant-current Results: Moving from supine to the sitting, standing, or prone positions caused all three thresholds (perceptual, usage, and discomfort) to increase by 22% to 34% for constant-voltage stimulators and by 44% to 82% for constant-current stimulators. Changing from a seated to a supine position caused stimulation to exceed discomfort threshold significantly more often for constant-current (87%) than for constant-voltage (63%) stimulators (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Posture-induced changes in SCS thresholds occurred consistently as patients moved from lying (supine or prone) to upright (standing or sitting) positions. These changes were more pronounced for constant-current than for constant-voltage pulse generators and more often led to stimulation-evoked discomfort. These observations are consistent with postural changes in spinal cord position measured in imaging studies, and with computer model predictions of neural recruitment for these different spinal cord positions. These observations have implications for the design, implantation, and clinical application of spinal cord stimulators, not only for conventional paresthesia-based SCS but also for paresthesia-free SCS.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 182
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review
    Lucky Krog
    Jillian Maloney
    Scott Pew
    Olufunmilola Adeleye
    Brooks Johnson
    Brett Glenn
    Benjamin Gill
    Vinicius Tieppo Francio
    Robert Pagan-Rosado
    Madeline Whitney
    Neil Sinha
    Natalie Strand
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2024, 28 : 239 - 249
  • [42] Dynamic Detection of Spinal Cord Position During Postural Changes Using Near-Infrared Reflectometry
    Wolf, Erich W., II
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (06): : 448 - 459
  • [43] Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain Thresholds and Sensory Perceptions in Chronic Pain Patients
    Ahmed, Shihab U.
    Zhang, Yi
    Chen, Lucy
    St Hillary, Kristin
    Cohen, Abigail
    Trang Vo
    Houghton, Mary
    Mao, Jianren
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (05): : 355 - 360
  • [44] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: Current Status and Perspective
    Fan, Shu
    Wang, Wei
    Zheng, Xiaolong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2025, 26 (02)
  • [45] A Review of Clinical Data on Salvage Therapy in Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Reddy, Rajiv D.
    Moheimani, Roya
    Yu, Gregory G.
    Chakravarthy, Krishnan V.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (05): : 562 - 570
  • [46] Alternate Intraspinal Targets for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review
    Chien, George C. Chang
    Mekhail, Nagy
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (07): : 629 - +
  • [47] Combined Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report
    Choi, Ji Hye
    Choi, Shu Chung
    Kim, Dong Kyu
    Sung, Choon Ho
    Chon, Jin Young
    Hong, Sung Jin
    Lee, Ji Young
    Moon, Ho Sik
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2016, 19 (03) : E459 - E463
  • [48] Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Chapman, Kenneth B.
    Spiegel, Matthew A.
    van Helmond, Noud
    Patel, Kiran V.
    Yang, Ajax
    Yousef, Tariq A.
    Mandelberg, Nataniel
    Deer, Timothy
    Mogilner, Alon Y.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (07): : 1024 - 1032
  • [49] Modulation of the Somatosensory Evoked Potential by Attention and Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Niso, Guiomar
    Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
    Lenders, Mathieu W. P. M.
    de Vos, Cecile C.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [50] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study
    Alamri, Alexander
    Macdonald, Meredith
    Al-Mohammad, Alaa
    Ricciardi, Lucia
    Hart, Michael G.
    Pereira, Erlick A.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (12)