Energy, exergy and economic (3E) analysis and multi-objective optimization of a combined cycle power system integrating compressed air energy storage and high-temperature thermal energy storage

被引:28
作者
Cao, Ruifeng [1 ]
Li, Weiqiang [1 ]
Cong, Xiaowei [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Yanfeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Elect Power Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Jilin 132012, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongdian Syst Construct Engn Co Ltd, Beijing 100141, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Coupling Power Engn Technol Co Ltd, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
关键词
Compressed air energy storage; High temperature thermal energy storage; Thermodynamic analysis; Economic analysis; Multi-objective optimization; Combined cycle power system; HEAT-PUMP SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122077
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional adiabatic compressed air energy storage system has a low turbine efficiency and a low power output due to the low turbine inlet temperature and high turbine outlet temperature without heat recovery. To address these issues, a combined cycle power system integrating compressed air energy storage and high-temperature thermal energy storage is proposed in this paper. The thermodynamic and economic models of the proposed system are developed considering the thermodynamic laws and life cycle assessment, respectively. The energy, exergy, economic (3E) analysis of the system are performed based on the models. The results show that under the design condition, the round-trip efficiency, exergy efficiency, energy storage density, levelized cost of energy and dynamic payback period of the system can reach 59.22 %, 62.12 %, 5.77 kWh/m3, 0.1186 $/kWh and 6.51 years, respectively. The sensitivity analysis shows that the maximum air storage pressure, minimum air storage pressure and outlet temperature of high temperature thermal energy storage system are the critical parameters impacting the system performance. Finally, the multi-objective optimization of the proposed system is carried out. The aforementioned three parameters are selected as the decision variables and the round-trip efficiency and levelized cost of energy are chosen as the objective functions. Compared with the pre-optimization system, the round-trip efficiency, exergy efficiency, and energy storage density of the system increase by 0.47 %, 0.43 %, and 1.33 kWh/m3, respectively, while the levelized cost of energy and dynamic payback period decrease by 0.0051 $/kWh and 1.55 years, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] Investigation of discharge characteristics of a tri-generative system based on advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage
    Han, Zhonghe
    Guo, Senchuang
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 176 : 110 - 122
  • [22] Thermodynamic analyses and multi-objective optimization of operation mode of advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system
    Han, Zhonghe
    Guo, Senchuang
    Wang, Shan
    Li, Wei
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 174 : 45 - 53
  • [23] Optimal selection of air expansion machine in Compressed Air Energy Storage: A review
    He, Wei
    Wang, Jihong
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 87 : 77 - 95
  • [24] Study of cycle-to-cycle dynamic characteristics of adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage using packed bed Thermal Energy Storage
    He, Wei
    Wang, Jihong
    Wang, Yang
    Ding, Yulong
    Chen, Haisheng
    Wu, Yuting
    Garvey, Seamus
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 2120 - 2134
  • [25] Thermodynamics analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system integrating compressed air energy storage and gas-steam combined cycle
    He, Xin
    Li, ChengChen
    Wang, Huanran
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 260
  • [26] Compression performance optimization considering variable charge pressure in an adiabatic compressed air energy storage system
    He, Yang
    Chen, Haisheng
    Xu, Yujie
    Deng, Jianqiang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 165 : 349 - 359
  • [27] Assessment of the Huntorf compressed air energy storage plant performance under enhanced modifications
    Jafarizadeh, Heidar
    Soltani, M.
    Nathwani, Jatin
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 209
  • [28] Optimized Regulation of Hybrid Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System for Zero-Carbon-Emission Micro-Energy Network
    Jia, Qiwei
    Liu, Tingxiang
    Chen, Xiaotao
    Chen, Laijun
    Si, Yang
    Mei, Shengwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [29] Kandasamy S., 2014, American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, P50
  • [30] Analysis of turbine pressure, feed water temperature and condenser back pressure on performance of power generation system for lead-based reactor
    Khan, Muhammad Salman
    Song, Yong
    Xu, Chi
    [J]. CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40