Comparative Analysis of Machine-Learning Models for Recognizing Lane-Change Intention Using Vehicle Trajectory Data

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Renteng [1 ]
Ding, Shengxuan [2 ]
Wang, Chenzhu [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, Jiangsu Key Lab Urban ITS, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, 12800 Pegasus Dr 211, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Lane-Change Intention; machine learning; LightGBM; CitySim Dataset;
D O I
10.3390/infrastructures8110156
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurate detection and prediction of the lane-change (LC) processes can help autonomous vehicles better understand their surrounding environment, recognize potential safety hazards, and improve traffic safety. This study focuses on the LC process, using vehicle trajectory data to select a model for identifying vehicle LC intentions. Considering longitudinal and lateral dimensions, the information extracted from vehicle trajectory data includes the interactive effects among target and adjacent vehicles (54 indicators) as input parameters. The LC intention of the target vehicle serves as the output metric. This study compares three widely recognized machine-learning models: support vector machines (SVM), ensemble methods (EM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. The ten-fold cross-validated method was used for model training and evaluation. Classification accuracy and training complexity were used as critical metrics for evaluating model performance. A total of 1023 vehicle trajectories were extracted from the CitySim dataset. The results indicate that, with an input length of 150 frames, the XGBoost and LightGBM models achieve an impressive overall classification performance of 98.4% and 98.3%, respectively. Compared to the LSTM and SVM models, the results show that the two ensemble models reduce the impact of Types I and III errors, with an improved accuracy of approximately 3.0%. Without sacrificing recognition accuracy, the LightGBM model exhibits a sixfold improvement in training efficiency compared to the XGBoost model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advanced geostatistical and machine-learning models for spatial data analysis of radioactively contaminated regions
    Kanevski, M
    Demyanov, V
    Pozdnukhov, A
    Parkin, R
    Savelieva, E
    Timonin, V
    Maignan, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2003, : 137 - 149
  • [32] Understanding household VMT generation: A comparative analysis with traditional statistical models and a machine-learning approach
    Tian, Guang
    Danton, Bob
    Li, Bin
    Gopu, Vijaya
    Codjoe, Julius A.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2024, 17 (01) : 881 - 901
  • [33] Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Models using Big Data Analytics and Machine Learning Techniques
    Alaketu, Muyideen Ayodeji
    Oguntimilehin, Abiodun
    Olatunji, Kehinde Adebola
    Abiola, Oluwatoyin Bunmi
    Badeji-Ajisafe, Bukola
    Akinduyite, Christiana Olanike
    Obamiyi, Stephen Eyitayo
    Babalola, Gbemisola Olutosin
    Okebule, Toyin
    INTERNATIONAL ARAB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (02) : 326 - 337
  • [34] Safe Data-Driven Lane Change Decision Using Machine Learning in Vehicular Networks
    Naja, Rola
    JOURNAL OF SENSOR AND ACTUATOR NETWORKS, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [35] Text and Voice Message Distraction Detection: A Machine Learning Approach Using Vehicle Trajectory Data
    Taherpour, Abolfazl
    Masoumi, Parisa
    Ansariyar, Alireza
    Yang, Di
    Ahangari, Samira
    Jeihani, Mansoureh
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (12) : 2005 - 2016
  • [36] Ensemble Modelling of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Habitats in the Western North Pacific Using Satellite Remotely Sensed Data; a Comparative Analysis Using Machine-Learning Models
    Mugo, Robinson
    Saitoh, Sei-Ichi
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [37] A comparative analysis of data sets using Machine Learning techniques
    Abhilash, C.B.
    Rohitaksha, K.
    Biradar, Shankar
    Souvenir of the 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC 2014, 2014, : 24 - 29
  • [38] A Comparative Analysis of Data sets using Machine Learning Techniques
    Abhilash, C. B.
    Rohitaksha, K.
    Biradar, Shankar
    SOUVENIR OF THE 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IACC), 2014, : 24 - 29
  • [39] Validation and utility of ARDS subphenotypes identified by machine-learning models using clinical data: an observational, multicohort, retrospective analysis
    Maddali, Manoj, V
    Churpek, Matthew
    Pham, Tai
    Rezoagli, Emanuele
    Zhuo, Hanjing
    Zhao, Wendi
    He, June
    Delucchi, Kevin L.
    Wang, Chunxue
    Wickersham, Nancy
    McNeil, J. Brennan
    Jauregui, Alejandra
    Ke, Serena
    Vessel, Kathryn
    Gomez, Antonio
    Hendrickson, Carolyn M.
    Kangelaris, Kirsten N.
    Sarma, Aartik
    Leligdowicz, Aleksandra
    Liu, Kathleen D.
    Matthay, Michael A.
    Ware, Lorraine B.
    Laffey, John G.
    Bellani, Giacomo
    Calfee, Carolyn S.
    Sinha, Pratik
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (04): : 367 - 377
  • [40] Detection of Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Soybeans Using Hyperspectral Data in Machine-Learning Models
    Oliveira, Izabela Cristina de
    Gava, Ricardo
    Santana, Dthenifer Cordeiro
    Seron, Ana Carina da Silva Cândido
    Teodoro, Larissa Pereira Ribeiro
    Cotrim, Mayara Favero
    Santos, Regimar Garcia dos
    Alvarez, Rita de Cássia Félix
    Junior, Carlos Antonio da Silva
    Baio, Fábio Henrique Rojo
    Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
    Algorithms, 2024, 17 (12)