Simplified Model of Heat Load Prediction and Its Application in Estimation of Building Envelope Thermal Performance

被引:5
作者
Hao, Ziyang [1 ]
Xie, Jingchao [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaojing [1 ]
Liu, Jiaping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Green Built Environm & Energy Efficient Te, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
heat load prediction; balance point temperature; quasi-steady-state method; variable-base degree-day; BESTEST; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; BESTEST; WALLS;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13041076
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study provides a reference for estimating the building envelope thermal performance at the initial stage of design for nearly zero-energy buildings in different climate zones. A simplified model of heat load prediction, which combines the quasi-steady-state thermal balance calculation procedure in ISO 52016 and the variable-base degree-days method, was proposed. Therefore, a building energy performance evaluation tool BPT V1.0 was developed. Subsequently, the simplified model was validated through comparative analysis with the Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST) standard procedure. To conduct a feasibility analysis of the development tool, case studies were performed on the performance evaluation of building envelopes of residential and office buildings in different climate zones in China. Compared to the simulation results from EnergyPlus, the deviation of heat load calculated by BPT V1.0 was within 10%, which further verifies the applicability of the tool under different climatic conditions. Annual heat load under different thermal performance building envelopes was calculated through BPT V1.0. The building energy efficiency improvement rates were found to range from 30 to 60% in nearly zero-energy buildings in different climate zones in China. The study results can provide a reference for energy managers and a basis for estimating the building energy efficiency performance with different envelope thermal properties in the region.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review
    Abu Bakar, Nur Najihah
    Hassan, Mohammad Yusri
    Abdullah, Hayati
    Rahman, Hasimah Abdul
    Abdullah, Md Pauzi
    Hussin, Faridah
    Bandi, Masilah
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 44 : 1 - 11
  • [2] Comparison of EnergyPlus and IES to model a complex university building using three scenarios: Free-floating, ideal air load system, and detailed
    Al-janabi, Ali
    Kavgic, Miroslava
    Mohammadzadeh, Ali
    Azzouz, Afaf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 : 262 - 280
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Criteria for Passive House Component certification
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, ISO 13789:2017
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, 5201612017 ISO, P204
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2015, JGJT3462014 CABR XAU
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, 513502019 GBT CABR H, P126
  • [8] ASHRAE, 2017, 55 ASHRAE, P12
  • [9] Bhardwaj M., 2022, EM TRENDS EN CONV TH, P191
  • [10] Boemi S.-N., 2016, ENERGY PERFORMANCE B, P79, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_5]