On the Matter of Different Approaches to a National Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Energy

被引：1

作者：

Adamov, E. O. ^{[1
]}

Ivanov, V. K. ^{[1
]}

Mochalov, Yu. S. ^{[1
]}

Rachkov, V. I. ^{[1
]}

Shadrin, A. Yu. ^{[1
]}

Khomyakov, Yu. S. ^{[1
]}

Lachkanov, E. V. ^{[1
]}

Orlov, A. I. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Proryv JSC, Moscow, Russia

来源：

ATOMIC ENERGY | 2023年 / 132卷 / 3期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/s10512-023-00916-5

中图分类号：

TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];

学科分类号：

0827 ; 082701 ;

摘要：

This article continues the debate on choosing a sequel to a strategy for the development of nuclear energy in the country. The provisions set forth in articles by the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute on the transition to a thorium-uranium nuclear fuel cycle are analyzed and compared with the Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Energy in Russia to 2050 and Prospects for the Period to 2100, which the Presidium of the Scientific and Technical Council of Rosatom State Corporation approved in 2018. The environmental impacts of nuclear power under these two approaches are compared. It is concluded that in an open nuclear fuel cycle thorium-uranium fuel has no significant advantages, including in the sphere of radiation safety.

引用

页码：133 / 142

页数：10

共 23 条

[1]

[Адамов Е.О. ADAMOV E.O.], 2015, [Известия Российской академии наук. Энергетика, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Energetika], P3

[2]

[Адамов Е.О. ADAMOV E.O.], 2015, [Известия Российской академии наук. Энергетика, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Energetika], P15

[3]

Adamov E. O., 2016, IZV ROSS AKAD NAUK E, P1

[4]

Adamov E. O., 2001, WHITE BOOK NUCL ENER

[5]

Adamov E. O., 2012, CONCEPTUAL PROVISION

[6]

Adamov E. O., 2017, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Energ., P3

[7]

[Алексеев П.Н. Alekseev P.N.], 2019, [Атомная энергия, Atomnaya energiya], V126, P183

[8]

[Anonymous], 2002, FEDERAL LAW NO 7 FZ

[9]

[Anonymous], 2014, 09114 NP GEN PROV FE

[10]

[Anonymous], 2000, RAD IMP SPENT NUCL F

← 1 2 3 →