In operando investigations of oscillatory water and carbonate effects in MEA-based CO2 electrolysis devices

被引:102
作者
Moss, Asger B. [1 ]
Garg, Sahil [1 ]
Mirolo, Marta [2 ]
Rodriguez, Carlos A. Giron [1 ]
Ilvonen, Roosa [2 ]
Chorkendorff, Ib [1 ]
Drnec, Jakub [2 ]
Seger, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Surface Phys & Catalysis SurfCat Sect, Dept Phys, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
[2] European Synchrotron Radiat Facil, Expt Div, Grenoble, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
GAS; ELECTROREDUCTION; QUANTIFICATION; CONVERSION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.013
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Membrane electrode assembly (MEA) CO2 electrolyzers are a prom-ising approach toward producing carbon-neutral chemicals; however, they often have stability issues related to flooding of the gas diffusion electrode (GDE). Thus, there is an urgent need to comprehend water management in these devices and to engineer electrodes that allow both stable and efficient electrocatalytic performance. Here, we investigated the possible causes of suppression in the CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) selectivity on Cu via in operando X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The in operando XRD allowed us to monitor electro-lyte evolution and bicarbonate formation in the GDE, while in-line gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer allowed us to correlate those changes to the cathode and anode product distribution during CO2 electrolysis (CO2E). We found direct evidence for salt precipita-tion in the cathode GDEs, which causes electrolyte build-up and an increase in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). We also observed that the increase in HER is related to a drop in cell potential, at least partially caused by a shift in ion transport through the membrane from carbonates to more conductive hydroxide ions. Thus, this work suggests that proper ion management is an important key to enhanced durability throughout the device.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 365
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V13, P4098, DOI [10.1039/D0EE02589E, DOI 10.1039/D0EE02589E]
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACS CATAL, V8, P3035, DOI [10.1021/acscatal.7b03807, DOI 10.1021/ACSCATAL.7B03807]
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V243, DOI [10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114302, DOI 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2021.114302]
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACS ENERGY LETT, V4, P1770, DOI [10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01142, DOI 10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.9B01142]
[5]  
[Anonymous], J MEMBRANE SCI, V598, DOI [10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117680, DOI 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2019.117680]
[6]  
[Anonymous], ACS APPL MATER INTER, V14, P7779, DOI [10.1021/acsami.1c18856, DOI 10.1021/ACSAMI.1C18856]
[7]  
[Anonymous], ACS ENERGY LETT, V4, P317, DOI [10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02035, DOI 10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.8B02035]
[8]  
[Anonymous], ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V12, P1950, DOI [10.1039/C9EE00909D, DOI 10.1039/C9EE00909D]
[9]  
[Anonymous], ACS ENERGY LETT, V7, P939, DOI [10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02658, DOI 10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.1C02658]
[10]  
[Anonymous], NAT ENERGY, V6, P439, DOI [10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w, DOI 10.1038/S41560-021-00813-W]