Examining the Impact of Jail Sanctions on Recidivism for Domestic Violence Probationers

被引:1
作者
Dagenhardt, Danielle M. Romain M. [1 ]
Heideman, Amanda [1 ]
Freiburger, Tina L. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Criminal Justice & Criminol, POB 786, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
domestic violence courts; judicial discretion; recidivism; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; SUBSTANCE USE; PROGRAM COMPLETION; MENTAL-ILLNESS; OFFENDERS; JUSTICE; SUPERVISION; ETHNICITY; GENDER; ARREST;
D O I
10.1177/08862605221145708
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
There has been a growth of domestic violence courts aimed at increasing offender accountability and victim safety. Although research has examined the effectiveness of these courts compared to typical court processing on recidivism, little is known about the mechanism of judicial accountability. Specifically, judicial review hearings, in which judges have discretion on whether and how to sanction for noncompliance, are common in these courts. This study examines whether incarceration sanctions for noncompliance affect recidivism among a sample of 347 probation review hearings in a Midwestern domestic violence court. Using logistic regression and survival analysis, we find that jail sanctions do not impact likelihood of recidivating but do result in significantly shorter periods of time until recidivating. The findings also signify the importance of addressing substance abuse issues in the prevention of recidivism. Further implications of the findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:7383 / 7403
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Population estimates by demographic characteristics. Table 2: annual estimates of the population by selected age groups and sex for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1
[2]   Program completion and re-arrest in a batterer intervention system [J].
Bennett, Larry W. ;
Stoops, Charles ;
Call, Christine ;
Flett, Heather .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2007, 17 (01) :42-54
[3]  
Buzawa E.S., 2003, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CR
[4]   Substance Use and Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-Analytic Review [J].
Cafferky, Bryan M. ;
Mendez, Marcos ;
Anderson, Jared R. ;
Stith, Sandra M. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2018, 8 (01) :110-131
[5]  
Cissner A. B., 2021, TAKING PROBLEM SOLVI, P215
[6]   Domestic Violence Courts: A Multisite Test of Whether and How They Change Offender Outcomes [J].
Cissner, Amanda B. ;
Labriola, Melissa ;
Rempel, Michael .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2015, 21 (09) :1102-1122
[7]  
Cohen J., 1992, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V1, P98, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10768783, DOI 10.2307/20182143]
[8]   Predicting Recidivism Among Defendants in an Expedited Domestic Violence Court [J].
Collins, Angela M. ;
Bouffard, Leana A. ;
Wilkes, Nicole .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (13-14) :NP6890-NP6903
[9]   "You Know Baseball? 3 Strikes": Understanding Racial Disparity with Mixed Methods for Probation Review Hearings [J].
Dagenhardt, Danielle M. Romain .
SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 10 (06)
[10]   Defining Justice: Restorative and Retributive Justice Goals Among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors [J].
Decker, Michele R. ;
Holliday, Charvonne N. ;
Hameeduddin, Zaynab ;
Shah, Roma ;
Miller, Janice ;
Dantzler, Joyce ;
Goodmark, Leigh .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2022, 37 (5-6) :NP2844-NP2867