Is Lymphadenectomy Reasonable for Elderly Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients?

被引:1
作者
Lin, Qianyi [1 ]
Chen, Jianjun [2 ]
Li, Kangde [1 ]
Yang, Junxing [3 ]
Luo, Xiaofeng [3 ]
Cai, Qi [1 ]
Lin, Weihong [1 ]
Peng, Guanjing [1 ]
Chen, Dexiong [1 ]
Qin, Chunhong [1 ]
He, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Zhenlong [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Cent Peoples Hosp Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg 6, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Cent Peoples Hosp Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg 2, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Med Univ, Cent Peoples Hosp Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg 7, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Elderly; Lymphadenectomy; Perioperative mortality; Overall survival; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RESECTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-023-05846-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) on clinical outcomes in ICC patients aged >= 70 years.Methods Four hundred and three eligible patients diagnosed with ICC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The impact of LND on perioperative mortality and overall survival (OS) as well as the optimal total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) was estimated.Results One hundred thirty-nine pairs of patients were matched by propensity score matching. Perioperative mortality was comparable between the LND and non-LND (nLND) groups (0.7% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.367). The median OS in the LND group was significantly longer (44 vs. 32 months, P = 0.045) and LND was identified as an independent protective factor for OS by multivariate analysis (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92, P = 0.014). Patients with the following characteristics were potential beneficiaries of LND: white, female, no/moderate fibrosis, tumor size > 5 cm, solitary tumor, and localized invasion (all P < 0.05). TNLE >= 6 had the greatest discriminatory power for identifying lymph node metastasis (area under the curve, 0.704, Youden index, 0.365, P = 0.002). Patients with pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis are likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy (40 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.052).Conclusions Advanced age (>= 70 years) was not a contraindication for LND, which facilitates accurate nodal staging and guides postoperative management. Appropriately selected elderly populations could benefit from LND.
引用
收藏
页码:2451 / 2463
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a critical review of the literature to date
    Adachi, Tomohiko
    Eguchi, Susumu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (03) : 162 - 168
  • [2] Amin MB., 2017, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, V8th
  • [3] Management of Lymph Nodes During Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Amini, Neda
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Kim, Yuhree
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (12) : 2136 - 2148
  • [4] Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Peri-Operative Outcomes
    Bagante, Fabio
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Weiss, Matthew
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Marques, Hugo P.
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Pulitano, Carlo
    Bauer, Todd W.
    Shen, Feng
    Poultsides, George A.
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Martel, Guillaume
    Koerkamp, B. Groot
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Itaru, Endo
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (08) : 2551 - 2560
  • [5] Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognosis of Patients Who Did Not Undergo Lymphadenectomy
    Bagante, Fabio
    Gani, Faiz
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Xu, Li
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Marques, Hugo P.
    Lamelas, Jorge
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Gamblin, T. Clark
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Pulitano, Carlo
    Bauer, Todd W.
    Shen, Feng
    Poultsides, George A.
    Marsh, J. Wallis
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (06) : 1031 - +
  • [6] Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients - is it reasonable?
    Bartsch, Fabian
    Baumgart, Janine
    Tripke, Verena
    Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
    Heinrich, Stefan
    Lang, Hauke
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [7] Surgical Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Emerging Principles
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Cloyd, Jordan M.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [8] Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021
    Benson III, Al B.
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    Abbott, Daniel E.
    Anaya, Daniel A.
    Anders, Robert
    Are, Chandrakanth
    Bachini, Melinda
    Borad, Mitesh
    Brown, Daniel
    Burgoyne, Adam
    Chahal, Prabhleen
    Chang, Daniel T.
    Cloyd, Jordan
    Covey, Anne M.
    Glazer, Evan S.
    Goyal, Lipika
    Hawkins, William G.
    Iyer, Renuka
    Jacob, Rojymon
    Kelley, R. Kate
    Kim, Robin
    Levine, Matthew
    Palta, Manisha
    Park, James O.
    Raman, Steven
    Reddy, Sanjay
    Sahai, Vaibhav
    Schefter, Tracey
    Singh, Gagandeep
    Stein, Stacey
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Venook, Alan P.
    Yopp, Adam
    McMillian, Nicole R.
    Hochstetler, Cindy
    Darlow, Susan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2021, 19 (05): : 541 - 565
  • [9] Treatment of Older Adults with Cancer - Addressing Gaps in Evidence
    Bertagnolli, Monica M.
    Singh, Harpreet
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (12) : 1062 - 1065
  • [10] Optimal extent of surgical and pathologic lymph node evaluation for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Brauer, David G.
    Fields, Ryan C.
    Tan, Benjamin R., Jr.
    Doyle, M. B. Majella
    Hammill, Chet W.
    Hawkins, William G.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Chapman, William C.
    [J]. HPB, 2018, 20 (05) : 470 - 476