The influence of predictability, visual contrast, and preview validity on eye movements and N400 amplitude: co-registration evidence that the N400 reflects late processes

被引:7
作者
Burnsky, Jon [1 ]
Kretzschmar, Franziska [2 ]
Mayer, Erika [3 ]
Staub, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Leibniz Inst German Language, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Dept Linguist, Amherst, MA USA
关键词
Eye movements; N400; predictability; word recognition; reading; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; WORD-FREQUENCY; FIXATION DURATIONS; PARAFOVEAL; MODEL; COREGISTRATION; RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; COMPONENT; PACKAGE;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2022.2159990
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Two eye movement/EEG co-registration experiments investigated effects of predictability, visual contrast, and parafoveal preview in normal reading. Replicating previous studies, in Experiment 1 contrast and predictability additively influenced fixation durations, and in Experiment 2 invalid preview eliminated the predictability effect on early eye movement measures. In both experiments, predictability influenced the amplitude of the N400 component of the fixation-related potential. In Experiment 1, visual contrast did not influence the N400, and in Experiment 2, the effect of predictability on the N400 was larger with invalid preview, in opposition to the eye movement pattern. The N400 may reflect a late process of accessing conceptual representations while the duration of the eyes' fixation on a word is sensitive to the difficulty of perceptual encoding and early stages of word recognition. The effects of predictability on both fixation duration and the N400 suggest an influence of this variable at two distinct processing stages.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 842
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading [J].
Luke, Steven G. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2018, 80 (07) :1675-1682
[32]   Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal [J].
McDonald, Scott A. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (26) :4416-4424
[33]   Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials [J].
Nieuwland, Mante S. ;
Barr, Dale J. ;
Bartolozzi, Federica ;
Busch-Moreno, Simon ;
Darley, Emily ;
Donaldson, David, I ;
Ferguson, Heather J. ;
Fu, Xiao ;
Heyselaar, Evelien ;
Huettig, Falk ;
Husband, E. Matthew ;
Ito, Aine ;
Kazanina, Nina ;
Kogan, Vita ;
Kohut, Zdenko ;
Kulakova, Eugenia ;
Meziere, Diane ;
Politzer-Ahles, Stephen ;
Rousselet, Guillaume ;
Rueschemeyer, Shirley-Ann ;
Segaert, Katrien ;
Tuomainen, Jyrki ;
Zu Wolfsthurn, Sarah Von Grebmer .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 375 (1791)
[34]   Do 'early' brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review [J].
Nieuwland, Mante S. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 96 :367-400
[35]   Predictability effects during reading in the absence of parafoveal preview [J].
Parker, Adam J. ;
Kirkby, Julie A. ;
Slattery, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 29 (08) :902-911
[36]   Event-related brain potentials reveal how multiple aspects of semantic processing unfold across parafoveal and foveal vision during sentence reading [J].
Payne, Brennan R. ;
Stites, Mallory C. ;
Federmeier, Kara D. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (10)
[37]  
R Core Team, 2018, A language and environment for statistical computing
[38]   LEXICAL COMPLEXITY AND FIXATION TIMES IN READING - EFFECTS OF WORD-FREQUENCY, VERB COMPLEXITY, AND LEXICAL AMBIGUITY [J].
RAYNER, K ;
DUFFY, SA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1986, 14 (03) :191-201
[39]   The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model [J].
Rayner, K ;
Ashby, J ;
Pollatsek, A ;
Reichle, ED .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2004, 30 (04) :720-732
[40]   PERCEPTUAL SPAN AND PERIPHERAL CUES IN READING [J].
RAYNER, K .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 7 (01) :65-81