Gaps in megaproject management system literature: a systematic overview

被引:14
作者
Ashkanani, Salman [1 ]
Franzoi, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Engn Management & Decis Sci, Doha, Qatar
[2] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Megaproject management system; Review; Gaps; Risks; Success; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION; IMPLEMENTATION; PROJECTS; HEALTH; RISKS; COST;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-12-2021-1113
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to present a structured and comprehensive review of relevant works, collected through a systematic methodology and clustered into nine meaningful categories on megaproject management systems and the current requirements for improved industrial megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach The methodology employed in this paper retrieves relevant works from available online citation indexes that are published in peer-reviewed journals and other reliable sources from 2000 to 2021. Findings It has been observed that the literature on megaproject management is still premature and requires further research to understand better the main gaps and effects of large-scale and typically complex megaprojects. Significant improvements are needed towards covering gaps to address the project management system holistically over the entire project life cycle. There are no clear guidelines for achieving a complete and conclusive project management system and enhancing future megaprojects' management capabilities. Originality/value This paper provides a clear picture of the existing literature on megaproject management systems, contributing insights for successful megaproject projects. Additionally, the holistic analysis identifies gaps in the body of knowledge, revealing avenues for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1318
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Kujala, Jaakko .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (04) :381-397
[2]   Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Sivonen, Risto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (02) :131-141
[3]   Lessons Learned, Barriers, and Improvement Factors for Mega Building Construction Projects in Developing Countries: Review Study [J].
Abu Aisheh, Yazan Issa .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
[4]   Addressing behavioural safety concerns on Qatari Mega projects [J].
Ajayi, S. O. ;
Adegbenro, O. O. ;
Alaka, H. A. ;
Oyegoke, A. S. ;
Manu, P. A. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 41
[5]  
Alan A., 2003, Book Review: Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment, DOI DOI 10.1177/1078087404267962
[6]   Scenario-based preference modeling to examine the robustness of airport mega projects initiatives [J].
AlKheder, Sharaf ;
Talib, Dalal ;
Al-Mutairi, Ayedh .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 797
[7]   Need for Alternative Research Approaches in Construction Management: Case of Delay Studies [J].
AlSehaimi, Abdullah ;
Koskela, Lauri ;
Tzortzopoulos, Patricia .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (04) :407-413
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Health and Safety Executive
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Global Risks Report
[10]  
Ardakani S., 2021, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, V22, P809, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S42107-021-00348-1, 10.1007/S42107-021-00348-1]