Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services

被引:32
作者
Wang, Jinnan [1 ]
Wu, Wenjun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Meng [4 ]
Gao, Yueming [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Jiacheng [5 ]
Yang, Weishan [2 ]
Ma, Guoxia [2 ]
Yu, Fang [2 ]
Yao, Nan [6 ]
Jiang, Hongqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, State Environm Protect Key Lab Environm Planning &, Beijing 100041, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Ecoenvironm Accounting, Beijing 100041, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Innovat Ctr Ecoenvironm Oriented Dev, Beijing 100041, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[6] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biophysical quantity; Monetary value; Trade; -off; Synergy; BUNDLES; CONSERVATION; FRAMEWORK; WORLDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ese.2024.100391
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The trade-off and synergy relationship of ecosystem services is an important topic in the current assessment. The value of each service provided by the ecosystem is substantially affected by human activities, and conversely, its changes will also affect the relevant human decisions. Due to varying tradeoffs among ecosystem services and synergies between them that can either increase or decrease, it is difficult to optimize multiple ecosystem services simultaneously, making it a huge challenge for ecosystem management. This study firstly develops a global Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting framework. It uses remote sensing data with a spatial resolution of 1 km to estimate the ecosystem services of forests, wetlands, grasslands, deserts, and farmlands in 179 major countries in 2018. The results show that the range of global GEP values is USD 112e197 trillion, with an average value of USD 155 trillion (the constant price), and the ratio of GEP to gross domestic product (GDP) is 1.85. The tradeoffs and the synergies among different ecosystem services in each continent and income group have been further explored. We found a correspondence between the income levels and the synergy among ecosystem services within each nation. Among specific ecosystem services, there are strong synergies between oxygen release, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration services. A trade-off relationship has been observed between flood regulation and other services, such as water conservation and soil retention services in low-income countries. The results will help clarify the roles and the feedback mechanisms between different stakeholders and provide a scientific basis for optimizing ecosystem management and implementing ecological compensation schemes to enhance human well-being. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WORLD DEV IND
[2]  
Asian Development Bank, 2018, World Water Outlook
[3]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[4]   The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy [J].
Braat, Leon C. ;
de Groot, Rudolf .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :4-15
[5]   Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management [J].
Bradford, John B. ;
D'Amato, Anthony W. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (04) :210-216
[6]   Global trends in nature's contributions to people [J].
Brauman, Kate A. ;
Garibaldi, Lucas A. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Yildiz ;
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
DeClerck, Fabrice ;
Jacob, Ute ;
Enrique Mastrangelo, Matias ;
Nkongolo, Nsalambi, V ;
Palang, Hannes ;
Perez-Mendez, Nestor ;
Shannon, Lynne J. ;
Shrestha, Uttam Babu ;
Strombom, Evelyn ;
Verma, Madhu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (51) :32799-32805
[7]   Ecosystem service trade-offs across global contexts and scales [J].
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine ;
Balvanera, Patricia ;
King, Elizabeth ;
Polasky, Stephen .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01)
[8]   Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead [J].
Cord, Anna F. ;
Bartkowski, Bartosz ;
Beckmann, Michael ;
Dittrich, Andreas ;
Hermans-Neumann, Kathleen ;
Kaim, Andrea ;
Lienhoop, Nele ;
Locher-Krause, Karla ;
Priess, Joerg ;
Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph ;
Schwarz, Nina ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Strauch, Michael ;
Vaclavik, Tomas ;
Volk, Martin .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 :264-272
[9]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[10]   Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? [J].
Costanza, Robert ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Braat, Leon ;
Kubiszewski, Ida ;
Fioramonti, Lorenzo ;
Sutton, Paul ;
Farber, Steve ;
Grasso, Monica .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 :1-16