Patient-reported involvement in shared decision-making during medical consultations: a systematic literature review

被引:1
作者
Narapaka, Pavan Kumar [1 ]
Singh, Manisha [2 ]
Ramesh, M. [3 ]
Dhingra, Sameer [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Pharmaceut Educ & Res NIPER, Dept Pharm Practice, Hajipur, Bihar, India
[2] Mahavir Canc Sansthan & Res Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] JSS Acad Higher Educ & Res, JSS Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG | 2023年
关键词
Shared decision-making; Patient centered care; Patient engagement; Patient-reported outcomes; Patient participation; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s10389-023-02153-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
AimShared decision-making (SDM) involves patients and physicians working together to make healthcare decisions, thus providing patient-centered care. This study evaluates patients' reported participation in decision-making during medical consultations.Subject and methodsWe searched the PubMed and Scopus electronic databases for studies on patient involvement, which were evaluated using the SDM-Q-9, OPTION (observing patient involvement), and CollaboRATE scales. We only included studies published from 2012-2022 that reported patient outcomes of involvement. Our team screened the titles and abstracts of each study for eligibility, collected general information, and evaluated methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist.ResultsThe European Social Research Council guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews was utilized to thoroughly examine the level of patient participation in decision-making. After reviewing 8456 studies, we included 15 studies with a total of 23,697 participants in our final analysis. Of these, four studies were on psychiatry, cancer, and diabetes, with most studies conducted in the USA and UK, and one each in Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Uganda. Participants were predominantly female, most aged over 50 years. The studies involved patients with mixed levels of education. Studies on psychiatric patients reported positive involvement, with younger patients more involved in decision-making. Among cancer patients, educated people with a history of cancer were more involved, while participants from the Asian region demonstrated lower odds on univariate analysis. Among diabetic patients, good involvement in decision-making was observed. Only one study reported patient involvement from a lower-middle-income country (Uganda), and reported that 84% of the study population agreed that the doctor gave them enough time to discuss all their symptoms.ConclusionOur review thoroughly assesses the degree of patient involvement in healthcare decision-making. The studies we analyzed were conducted primarily in the USA and UK, and the findings indicate that younger and educated patients tend to be more actively engaged in the decision-making process. It is imperative that healthcare providers take action to ensure that patients are fully aware of the significance of their role in making informed healthcare decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The OPTION Scale: Measuring Patients' Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Alrawiai, Sumaiah
    Aljaffary, Afnan
    Al-Rayes, Saja
    Alumran, Arwa
    Alhuseini, Mishael
    Hariri, Bayan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2020, 13 : 1337 - 1346
  • [2] Briggs Joanna, 2017, Joanna BriggsInstitute
  • [3] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) : 681 - 692
  • [4] To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables
    De las Cuevas, Carlos
    Penate, Wenceslao
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 2014, 26 (06): : 372 - 381
  • [5] Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process
    Deegan, Patricia E.
    Drake, Robert E.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2006, 57 (11) : 1636 - 1639
  • [6] Discrepancy in Ratings of Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Health Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study in Mental Health Care
    Drivenes, Karin
    Haaland, Vegard O.
    Hauge, Yina L.
    Vederhus, John-Kare
    Irgens, Audun C.
    Solli, Kristin Klemmetsby
    Regevik, Hilde
    Falk, Ragnhild S.
    Tanum, Lars
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [7] Do Traditional Institutions Constrain Female Entrepreneurship? A Field Experiment on Business Training in India
    Field, Erica
    Jayachandran, Seema
    Pande, Rohini
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [8] Shared decision making in chronic care in the context of evidence based practice in nursing
    Friesen-Storms, Jolanda H. H. M.
    Bours, Gerrie J. J. W.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Beurskens, Anna J. H. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (01) : 393 - 402
  • [9] Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital
    Gruene, Britta
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjoern
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Alpers, Georg W.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (12) : 4491 - 4498
  • [10] Could shared decision making affect staying in hospital? A cross-sectional pilot study
    Gualano, M. R.
    Bert, F.
    Passi, S.
    Stillo, M.
    Brescia, V.
    Scaioli, G.
    Thomas, R.
    Voglino, G.
    Minniti, D.
    Boraso, F.
    Siliquini, R.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)