Vulnerable Students, Inclusion, and Digital Education in the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Case Study From Austria

被引:4
作者
Moehlen, Lisa-Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Prummer, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Ctr Teacher Educ, Vienna, Austria
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Dept Educ Sci, Braunschweig, Germany
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Austria; Covid-19; pandemic; digital divide; distance learning; exclusion; inclusive education; SEN;
D O I
10.17645/si.v11i1.5850
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Worldwide, more than 1.5 billion students had to switch to distance learning in 2020. Education took place at home, where parents attended to their children, and teachers taught their students in digital mode, while minors were physically and socially isolated from their peers. Concerning the situation in Austria, several quantitative studies expose two central chal-lenges: First, the comprehensive lack of digital infrastructure disrupted (digital) distance learning. Second, the Covid-19 pandemic particularly affected vulnerable students and extended educational inequality. The state of the art emphasizes a lack of qualitative studies demonstrating different perspectives on the educational situation of vulnerable students in general and with SEN in particular during the pandemic. This leads to the following research question: How do profes-sional actors map the situation of inclusive and digital education during the Covid-19 pandemic in Austria? To research this unprecedented situation, four focus groups with diverse stakeholders (teachers, principals, psychologists, and school board employees) discussed their experiences in the school years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. Data were analyzed accord-ing to the Grounded Theory method of the postmodern approach referred to as "situational analysis." The study visualizes various parallel discourses and voices within the situation of (digital distance) learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. The theoretical context of the intersection of inclusive and digital education frames the empirical findings. Central find-ings relate to missing or discriminatory guidelines and policies, a lack of digital infrastructure, and altered professional -pedagogical support that minimized or disrupted inclusive education during (digital) distance learning.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 112
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahrbeck B., 2014, POLITISCHE MEINUNG, V59, P13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All Means All, DOI [10.54676/JJNK6989, DOI 10.18356/2DDB782C-EN]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, UNDERSTANDING DIGITA, DOI [DOI 10.1787/236405667766, 10.1787/236405667766]
[4]  
Besic E., 2020, Z INKLUSION, V3
[5]  
Biewer Gottfried., 2017, Grundlagen der Heilpadagogik und Inklusiven Padagogik
[6]  
BMBWF, 2021, GZ20210065827 BMBWF
[7]  
BMBWF, 2020, GS20200748656 BMBWF
[8]  
Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste
[9]   From special to inclusive education policies in Austria - developments and implications for schools and teacher education [J].
Buchner, Tobias ;
Proyer, Michelle .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 43 (01) :83-94
[10]  
Clarke A.E., 2015, SITUATIONAL ANAL PRA