A Patient Decision Aid About Conservative Kidney Management in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Randomized Pilot Trial

被引:13
作者
Wong, Susan P. Y. [1 ,3 ]
Oestreich, Taryn [1 ]
Prince, David K. [1 ]
Curtis, J. Randall [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Renal Dialysis Unit, VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, 1660 S Columbian Way,Bldg 100, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL; VETERANS-AFFAIRS; OLDER PATIENTS; DIALYSIS; CARE; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Rationale & Objective: Available decision aids for patients about treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) often lack information on conservative kidney management (CKM). We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid on CKM among patients with advanced CKD and their family members.Study Design: Randomized pilot trial.Setting & Participants: Patients aged & GE;75 years with stage 4 or 5 CKD and their family members at 4 medical centers in the greater Seattle area between August 2020 and December 2021.Interventions: Usual care with or without a de-cision aid on CKM. Outcome: Acceptability was assessed by attrition rates between the initial study visit (T1) and the 3-month follow-up evaluation (T3). The primary outcome and measure of feasibility was the proportion of participants who discussed CKM with a health care provider between T1 and T3.Results: We randomized 92 patients of whom 86 (55.8% male; age 82 & PLUSMN; 6 years; 82.6% White) completed T1-42 in the usual care arm and 44 in the usual care plus decision aid arm-and 56 family members of whom 53 (18.9% male; age71 & PLUSMN; 11 years; 86.8% White) completed T1-20 in usual care arm and 33 in the usual care plus decisions aid arm. The attrition rates were 21% versus 21% (P = 1.0) for patients, and 10% versus 18% (P = 0.46) for family members in the usual care versus usual care plus decisions aid arms. Receipt of the decision aid significantly increased discussion of CKM with a health care provider for patients (26.4% vs 3.0%, P = 0.007) and family members (26.9% vs 0, P = 0.02). Limitations: Possible limited generalizability because participants were a relatively homoge-nous group. The decision aid focuses on CKM and may be less applicable to those with limited knowledge of kidney replacement therapies.Conclusions: A CKM decision aid was feasible and acceptable, and increased discussion of this treatment option with health care providers. This aid may serve as a useful adjunct to the currently available educational tools on treatments for advanced CKD.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 188
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions
    Ameling, Jessica M.
    Auguste, Priscilla
    Ephraim, Patti L.
    Lewis-Boyer, LaPricia
    DePasquale, Nicole
    Greer, Raquel C.
    Crews, Deidra C.
    Powe, Neil R.
    Rabb, Hamid
    Boulware, L. Ebony
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V75, pS1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, AMA Principles of Medical Ethics | American Medical Association
  • [4] Beebe J., 2001, Rapid assessment process: An introduction
  • [5] Is Maximum Conservative Management an Equivalent Treatment Option to Dialysis for Elderly Patients with Significant Comorbid Disease?
    Carson, Rachel C.
    Juszczak, Maciej
    Davenport, Andrew
    Burns, Aine
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 4 (10): : 1611 - 1619
  • [6] Rate of Decline of Kidney Function, Modality Choice, and Survival in Elderly Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease
    Chandna, Shahid M.
    Carpenter, Lewis
    Da Silva-Gane, Maria
    Warwicker, Paul
    Greenwood, Roger N.
    Farrington, Ken
    [J]. NEPHRON, 2016, 134 (02) : 64 - 72
  • [7] Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy
    Chandna, Shahid M.
    Da Silva-Gane, Maria
    Marshall, Catherine
    Warwicker, Paul
    Greenwood, Roger N.
    Farrington, Ken
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 26 (05) : 1608 - 1614
  • [8] Quality of Life and Survival in Patients with Advanced Kidney Failure Managed Conservatively or by Dialysis
    Da Silva-Gane, Maria
    Wellsted, David
    Greenshields, Hannah
    Norton, Sam
    Chandna, Shahid M.
    Farrington, Ken
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (12): : 2002 - 2009
  • [9] Hard choices, better outcomes: a review of shared decision-making and patient decision aids around dialysis initiation and conservative kidney management
    Davis, Janet L.
    Davison, Sara N.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2017, 26 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [10] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419