When Agility Meets a Project Portfolio: A Study of Success Factors in Large Organisations

被引:2
作者
Aghajani, Masoud [1 ]
Ahsan, Kamrul [2 ]
Whiteside, Naomi [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Dept Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Agile project management; project portfolio management; agile portfolio; IT and software development projects; success factor; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; LARGE-SCALE; RISK-MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH AGENDA; MODERATING ROLE; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; ROLES;
D O I
10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4113
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The iterative nature of agile methods combined with high levels of team and customer interactions and continuously changing IT and software development project requirements make the management of agile project portfolios very complex. To date, the mechanisms under which project portfolio management adapts to these complexities and achieves portfolio success have not been thoroughly investigated. This study explores the notion of success and its impacting factors in large organisations' portfolios of agile IT and software development projects. Using a multiple case study design, we analysed the agile project portfolios of seven large organisations. We identified four success criteria and 15 success factors and categorised them into a unique agile portfolio success framework. Some of these criteria and factors are unique to agile project portfolios. The framework contributes to agile and project management literature by conceptualising the notion of success in portfolios of agile projects while revealing a set of factors that affect the relationship between an agile portfolio with its subcomponents and the surrounding environment. The framework supports managers and practitioners in large organisations in reflecting on their agility efforts to achieve higher success rates in their agile portfolios.
引用
收藏
页数:48
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios [J].
Abrantes, Rui ;
Figueiredo, Jose .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (06) :1274-1288
[2]   A framework for modeling structural association among De-Motivators of scaling agile [J].
Abrar, Muhammad Faisal ;
Ali, Sikandar ;
Majeed, Muhammad Faran ;
Khan, Sohail ;
Khan, Muzamil ;
Ullah, Hamid ;
Khan, Mushtaq Ahmad ;
Baseer, Samad ;
Asshad, Muhammad .
JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2021, 33 (08)
[3]  
Agile-Business, 2017, AG PORTF MAN AGILEPF
[4]   Integrating sustainability issues into project management [J].
Analia Sanchez, Marisa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 96 :319-330
[5]   Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications [J].
Barratt, Mark ;
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Li, Mei .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (04) :329-342
[6]   Tailoring Product Ownership in Large-Scale Agile Projects Managing Scale, Distance, and Governance [J].
Bass, Julian M. ;
Haxby, Andy .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2019, 36 (02) :58-63
[7]   Agile Projects in Nonagile Portfolios: How Project Portfolio Contingencies Constrain Agile Projects' Teamwork Quality [J].
Bechtel, Jadena ;
Kaufmann, Carsten ;
Kock, Alexander .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (06) :3514-3528
[8]   Do scaling agile frameworks address global software development risks? An empirical study [J].
Beecham, Sarah ;
Clear, Tony ;
Lal, Ramesh ;
Noll, John .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2021, 171
[9]   Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success [J].
Beringer, Claus ;
Jonas, Daniel ;
Kock, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (06) :830-846
[10]   Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance [J].
Biedenbach, Thomas ;
Muller, Ralf .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (05) :621-635