Colorectal sessile serrated lesion detection using linked-color imaging versus narrow-band imaging: a parallel randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kan [1 ]
Wei, Yunlei [1 ]
Zhang, Di [1 ]
Wang, Yuxin [1 ]
Hou, Xiaojia [1 ]
Wu, Ruijin [1 ]
Peng, Kangsheng [1 ]
Li, Lei [1 ]
Huang, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Yilong [1 ]
Xun, Linjuan [1 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Digest Endoscopy Ctr, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Tenth Peoples Hosp Chongming Branch, Dept Gastroenterol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Digest Endoscopy Ctr, Sch Med, 301Mid Yanchang Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
关键词
WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY; WITHDRAWAL TIME; POLYP DETECTION; MISS RATE; MULTICENTER; CANCER; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/a-1995-2685
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Previous studies have reported the effectiveness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and linked-color imaging (LCI) in improving the detection of colorectal neoplasms. There has however been no direct comparison between LCI and NBI in the detection of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LCI and NBI in detecting colorectal SSLs.Methods A prospective, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted. The participants were randomly assigned to the LCI or NBI arms. The primary end point was the SSL detection rate (SDR).Results 406 patients were involved; 204 in the LCI arm and 202 in the NBI arm. The total polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and SDR were 54.2%, 38.7%, and 10.8%, respectively. The SDR was not significantly different between the LCI and NBI arms (12.3% vs. 9.4%; P = 0.36). The differences in the detection rate and the per-patient number of polyps, adenomas, diminutive lesions, and flat lesions between LCI and NBI also were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed that LCI and NBI were not independent factors associated with SDR, whereas Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95 %CI 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03), withdrawal time (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 1.00-1.26 ; P= 0.04), and operator experience (OR 3.73, 95 %CI 1.67-8.32; P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with SDR.Conclusions LCI and NBI are comparable for SSL detection, as well as for the detection of polyps and adenomas.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 554
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hood-Assisted Colonoscopy Is More Effective in Detection of Colorectal Adenomas Than Narrow-Band Imaging
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Kato, Naoyuki
    Ichise, Yasuyuki
    Kajiyama, Masashi
    Tanaka, Naoki
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 8 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [32] Linked colour imaging versus white-light colonoscopy for the detection of flat colorectal lesions: A randomized controlled trial
    Kudo, Takahiro
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Kyodo, Reiko
    Horiuchi, Ichitaro
    Arai, Nobuyasu
    Kajiyama, Masashi
    Tanaka, Naoki
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (06) : 1414 - 1420
  • [33] Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection
    Dinesen, Lotte
    Chua, Tee Joo
    Kaffes, Arthur John
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (03) : 604 - 611
  • [34] Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial
    Takuya Inoue
    Mitsuyuki Murano
    Naoko Murano
    Takanori Kuramoto
    Ken Kawakami
    Yosuke Abe
    Eijiro Morita
    Ken Toshina
    Hideo Hoshiro
    Yutaro Egashira
    Eiji Umegaki
    Kazuhide Higuchi
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, 43 : 45 - 50
  • [35] A randomized, controlled trial of narrow-band imaging vs high-definition white light for adenoma detection in patients at high risk of adenomas
    East, J. E.
    Ignjatovic, A.
    Suzuki, N.
    Guenther, T.
    Bassett, P.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    Saunders, B. P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (11) : E771 - E778
  • [36] Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial
    Inoue, Takuya
    Murano, Mitsuyuki
    Murano, Naoko
    Kuramoto, Takanori
    Kawakami, Ken
    Abe, Yosuke
    Morita, Eijiro
    Toshina, Ken
    Hoshiro, Hideo
    Egashira, Yutaro
    Umegaki, Eiji
    Higuchi, Kazuhide
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 43 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [37] The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy
    Hiroaki Ikematsu
    Yutaka Saito
    Shinji Tanaka
    Toshio Uraoka
    Yasushi Sano
    Takahiro Horimatsu
    Takahisa Matsuda
    Shiro Oka
    Reiji Higashi
    Hideki Ishikawa
    Kazuhiro Kaneko
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, 47 : 1099 - 1107
  • [38] Linked color imaging, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized trial
    Aniwan, Satimai
    Vanduangden, Kunvadee
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Piyachaturawat, Panida
    Jangsirikul, Sureeporn
    Luangsukrerk, Thanawat
    Kulpatcharapong, Santi
    Tiankanon, Kasenee
    Kongtab, Natanong
    Wisedopas, Naruemon
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 94 (05) : 969 - 977
  • [39] Chromoendoscopy versus narrow band imaging in UC: a prospective randomised controlled trial
    Bisschops, Raf
    Bessissow, Talat
    Joseph, Joseph A.
    Baert, Filip
    Ferrante, Marc
    Ballet, Vera
    Willekens, Hilde
    Demedts, Ingrid
    Geboes, Karel
    De Hertogh, Gert
    Vermeire, Severine
    Rutgeerts, Paul
    Van Assche, Gert
    GUT, 2018, 67 (06) : 1087 - 1094
  • [40] Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care A randomized controlled trial
    Buerger, Martin
    Weber, Marko
    Petersen, Iver
    Stallmach, Andreas
    Schmidt, Carsten
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (32) : E29858