The spirit is willing, but the institutions are weak: disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the financial sector in transition

被引:4
作者
Djalilov, Khurshid [1 ]
Hartwell, Christopher A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] ZHAW Sch Management & Law, Theaterstr 17, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[3] Kozminski Univ, ZHAW SML, Theaterstr 17, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Financial sector; Institutional environment; Transition; CSR DISCLOSURE; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; COMMERCIAL-BANKS; LIFE-CYCLE; DETERMINANTS; GOVERNANCE; EFFICIENCY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40821-022-00224-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Evidence exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and corporate financial performance (CFP) is consistently inconsistent, if not outright contradictory. We assert that much of this confusion is due to a failure to integrate both firm internal performance and the external environment into theoretical and empirical analyses of the effect of CSR disclosure on firm efficiency. This paper attempts to bring these two facets together in an examination of banking sector efficiency in a situation where the entire external environment is in flux, namely transition. Using a database of 319 banks from 21 transition countries, and using dynamic panel and quantile regressions, we provide empirical evidence that banks in transition countries saw benefits in firm performance only when CSR activities were layered on top of a strategy which already was profitable. Indeed, once profitability was achieved, only then did CSR disclosure begin to confer a competitive edge in developing firm resources. However, the external environment continues to exert an influence, and even where banks met profitability goals, predatory institutions can still make engaging in CSR a detriment to competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 427
页数:43
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Regulations, competition and bank risk-taking in transition countries [J].
Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. ;
Delis, Manthos D. ;
Pasiouras, Fotios .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2011, 7 (01) :38-48
[2]   Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress and firm life cycle: evidence from Australia [J].
Al-Hadi, Ahmed ;
Chatterjee, Bikram ;
Yaftian, Ali ;
Taylor, Grantley ;
Hasan, Mostafa Monzur .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2019, 59 (02) :961-989
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Institutional Barriers in the Transition to Market Examining Performance and Divergence in Transition Economies
[4]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[5]   Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance [J].
Arendt, Sebastian ;
Brettel, Malte .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2010, 48 (10) :1469-1492
[6]  
Athanasoglou P.P., 2008, J INT FINANC MARK I, V18, P121, DOI [10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001, DOI 10.1016/J.INTFIN.2006.07.001]
[7]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[8]  
Battese GE, 1995, J Empirical Econ, V20, P325, DOI [10.1007/BF01205442, DOI 10.1007/BF01205442]
[9]   CSR disclosure and financial performance revisited: A cross-country analysis [J].
Beck, Cornelia ;
Frost, Geoffrey ;
Jones, Stewart .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 43 (04) :517-537
[10]   Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency [J].
Belasri, Sanaa ;
Gomes, Mathieu ;
Pijourlet, Guillaume .
JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 54