Economic analysis of biomass briquettes made from coconut shells, rattan waste, banana peels and sugarcane bagasse in households cooking

被引:9
作者
Bot, Bill Vaneck [1 ,2 ]
Axaopoulos, Petros J. [2 ]
Sosso, Olivier Thierry [3 ]
Sakellariou, Evangelos, I [2 ]
Tamba, Jean Gaston [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Douala, Higher Natl Polytech Sch, Lab Energy Mat Modelling & Methods, Douala 2701, Cameroon
[2] Univ West Attica, Dept Mech Engn, Campus 2,Thivon 250, Athens 12241, Greece
[3] Univ Douala Cameroon, Adv Teachers Training Coll Tech Educ, Lab Thermal & Environm, POB 1872, Douala, Cameroon
[4] Univ Douala, Univ Inst Technol, Dept Thermal & Energy Engn, Douala 2701, Cameroon
关键词
Economic analysis; Biomass briquettes; Conventional fuels; Life Cycle Cost; Sensitivity analysis; FUEL BRIQUETTES; ENERGY; QUALITY; RICE;
D O I
10.1007/s40095-022-00508-2
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to analyse the economic viability of cooking biomass briquettes made from coconut shells, rattan waste, banana peels, and sugarcane bagasse by replacing conventional fuels such as fuelwood, charcoal and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). The life cycle cost method and the sensitivity analysis based on a 10-year lifetime are applied to a typical Cameroonian household with an annual cooking energy requirement of 950 kWh. According to the results, briquettes made from coconut shells have the lowest life cycle cost (384.6euro), while those made from banana peels have the highest cost (729.6euro). The fuelwood replacement has the highest present value of net benefit. Among the three conventional fuels investigated, wood charcoal is the cheapest. Changes in the price of conventional fuels and the market discount rate affect the economic feasibility of biomass briquettes. With the exception of the banana peel briquettes, briquettes are more cost-effective than fuelwood, wood charcoal and Liquefied Petroleum Gas. Decision makers should consider ways to include massive household use of biomass briquettes in sustainable development because they could be a leading mover in sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Indoor air pollution and household energy
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Annuaire des statistiques de l'environnement 2013
[3]  
Atyi E., 2013, TUDE LIMPORTANCE CON
[4]   Assessment of biomass briquette energy potential from agricultural residues in Cameroon [J].
Bot, Bill Vaneck ;
Tamba, Jean Gaston ;
Sosso, Olivier Thierry .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024, 14 (02) :1905-1917
[5]   Preparation and characterization of biomass briquettes made from banana peels, sugarcane bagasse, coconut shells and rattan waste [J].
Bot, Bill Vaneck ;
Sosso, Olivier Thierry ;
Tamba, Jean Gaston ;
Lekane, Eugenie ;
Bikai, Jacques ;
Ndame, Max Keller .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (09) :7937-7946
[6]   Production and Characterization of Fuel Briquettes from Banana Leaves Waste [J].
de Oliveira Maia, Bianca G. ;
Souza, Ozair ;
Marangoni, Cintia ;
Hotza, Dachamir ;
de Oliveira, Antonio Pedro N. ;
Sellin, Noeli .
ICONBM: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMASS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 37 :439-+
[7]   The influence of energy policy on charcoal consumption in urban households in Tanzania [J].
Doggart, Nike ;
Ruhinduka, Remidius ;
Meshack, Charles K. ;
Ishengoma, Romanus C. ;
Morgan-Brown, Theron ;
Abdallah, Jumanne M. ;
Spracklen, Dominick, V ;
Sallu, Susannah M. .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 57 :200-213
[8]   Influence of Moisture Content, Particle Size, and Binder Ratio on Quality and Economics of Rice Straw Briquettes [J].
Gill, Nishant ;
Dogra, Ritu ;
Dogra, Baldev .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (01) :54-68
[9]   Characteristics of biomass charcoal briquettes and pollutant emission reduction for sulfur and nitrogen during combustion [J].
Guo, Zhenkun ;
Wu, Jianjun ;
Zhang, Yixin ;
Wang, Feng ;
Guo, Yang ;
Chen, Kening ;
Liu, Hu .
FUEL, 2020, 272
[10]   Assessment of biomass energy resources and related technologies practice in Bangladesh [J].
Halder, P. K. ;
Paul, N. ;
Beg, M. R. A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :444-460