Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Technique for Ligamentum Flavum Cyst Removal

被引:4
|
作者
Tomasi, Santino Ottavio [1 ]
Umana, Giuseppe Emmanuele [2 ]
Scalia, Gianluca [3 ]
Raudino, Giuseppe [4 ]
Stevanovic, Vlado [5 ]
Krainz, Herbert [1 ]
Kral, Michael [1 ]
Nicoletti, Giovanni Federico [3 ]
Winkler, Peter A. A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Private Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Ignaz Harrer Str 79A, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Cannizzaro Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Catania, Italy
[3] Natl Specialist Hosp Garibaldi, Dept Neurosurg, Catania, Italy
[4] Human Ctr Oncol Catania, Dept Neurosurg, Catania, Sicilia, Italy
[5] Paracelsus Med Private Univ, Dept Neuroradiol, Salzburg, Austria
[6] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Dept Neurosurg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
lumbar stenosis; laminectomy; laminotomy; flavectomy back pain; lumbar muscles sparing; ligamentum flavum cyst removal; CANAL STENOSIS; POSTERIOR DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; OUTCOMES; LAMINOPLASTY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1715-3958
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laminotomy for lumbar stenosis is a well-defined procedure and represents a routine in every neurosurgical department. It is a common experience that the uni- or bilateral paraspinal muscle detachment, together with injury of the supra- and interspinous ligaments, can lead to postoperative pain. In the literature, the application of a minimally invasive technique, the lumbar spinous process-splitting ( LSPS) technique, has been reported. Methods In this study, we present a case series of 12 patients who underwent LSPS from September 2019 to April 2020. Two patients had a cyst of the ligamentum flavum, eight a single-level lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), and two a two-level LCS. Moreover, we propose a novel morphological classification of postoperative muscle atrophy and present volumetric analysis of the decompression achieved. Results There were no complications related to this technique. In all patients, the vertebral canal area was more than doubled by the procedure. The muscle sparing showed grade A, according to our classification. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first description of this surgical technique and the first LSPSL case series in Europe. Furthermore, cases of ligamentum flavumcyst removal using this safe and effective technique have not yet been reported.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video
    Gagliardi, Martin
    Guiroy, Alfredo
    Sicoli, Alfredo
    Masanes, Nicolas Gonzalez
    Ciancio, Alejandro Morales
    Asghar, Jahangir
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : 107 - 107
  • [32] Comparison of Modified Marmot Surgery and Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Two-Year Outcomes
    Masuda, Keisuke
    Shigematsu, Hideki
    Tanaka, Masato
    Kawasaki, Sachiko
    Suga, Yuma
    Yamamoto, Yusuke
    Iwata, Eiichiro
    Okuda, Akinori
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (03): : 165 - 170
  • [33] Finite Element Analysis for Comparison of Spinous Process Osteotomies Technique with Conventional Laminectomy as Lumbar Decompression Procedure
    Kim, Ho-Joong
    Chun, Heoung-Jae
    Kang, Kyoung-Tak
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    Chang, Bong-Soon
    Lee, Choon-Ki
    Yeom, Jin S.
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (01) : 146 - 153
  • [34] Comparative study of two spinous process (SP) osteotomy techniques for posterior decompression surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis: SP base versus splitting osteotomy
    Gun Woo Lee
    Myun-Whan Ahn
    European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 1644 - 1652
  • [35] Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression
    Tanaka, Sunao
    Wada, Kanichiro
    Kumagai, Gentaro
    Asari, Toru
    Aburakawa, Shuichi
    Yamasaki, Yoshihito
    Yokoyama, Toru
    Takeuchi, Kazunari
    Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (21) : E1136 - E1145