Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction A Multi-institutional Study
    Santosa, Katherine B.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Chun, Yoon Sun
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (02) : 390 - 395
  • [42] Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Barrou, Julien
    Jauffret, Camille
    Rua, Sandrine
    Sabiani, Laura
    Van Troy, Aurore
    Buttarelli, Max
    Blache, Guillaume
    Lambaudie, Eric
    Cohen, Monique
    Bannier, Marie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [43] Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant and latissimus dorsi muscle flap: Our initial experience
    Chen, Kuo
    Zhang, Jin
    Beeraka, Narasimha M. M.
    Song, Dajiang
    Sinelnikov, Mikhail Y. Y.
    Lu, Pengwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2023, 19 (05)
  • [44] Video-assisted Transaxillary Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method
    Songbo Zhang
    Yanyan Xie
    Faqing Liang
    Yao Wang
    Nan Wen
    Jiao Zhou
    Yu Feng
    Xinran Liu
    Qing Lv
    Zhenggui Du
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 91 - 98
  • [45] Video-assisted Transaxillary Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method
    Zhang, Songbo
    Xie, Yanyan
    Liang, Faqing
    Wang, Yao
    Wen, Nan
    Zhou, Jiao
    Feng, Yu
    Liu, Xinran
    Lv, Qing
    Du, Zhenggui
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [46] Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Moon, Jiae
    Lee, Jeea
    Lee, Dong Won
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Nam, Da Jung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Na Young
    Park, Hyung Seok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (11): : 2409 - 2416
  • [47] Salvage of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies With Autologous Flaps
    Qureshi, Ali A.
    Oliver, Jeremie D.
    Parikh, Rajiv P.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (07) : 734 - 741
  • [48] Comment on ''Hook Shape'' Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series
    Atiyeh, Bishara
    Emsieh, Saif
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [49] Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being
    Hammond, Jacob B.
    Kandi, Lyndsay A.
    Armstrong, Valerie L.
    Kosiorek, Heidi E.
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    Casey, William J., III
    Kruger, Erwin A.
    Cronin, Patricia A.
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    Teven, Chad M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (09) : 2914 - 2919
  • [50] Advances in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Oncological Safety and Incision Selection
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    Storm-Dickerson, Toni
    Whitworth, Pat
    Rubano, Christopher
    Gabriel, Allen
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (03) : 310 - 319