Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving Decision-making in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: The Key Role of Flap Thickness Ratio
    Pagliara, Domenico
    Montella, Rino Aldo
    Garganese, Giorgia
    Bove, Sonia
    Costantini, Melania
    Rinaldi, Pierluigi Maria
    Pino, Valentina
    Grieco, Federica
    Rubino, Corrado
    Salgarello, Marzia
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (02) : E37 - E44
  • [32] A formula for implant volume choice in breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy
    Georgiou, Charalambos A.
    Ihrai, Tarik
    Chamorey, Emmanuel
    Flipo, Bernard
    Chignon-Sicard, Berengere
    BREAST, 2012, 21 (06) : 781 - 782
  • [33] "Hook Shape" Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series
    Marcasciano, Marco
    Lo Torto, Federico
    Codolini, Luca
    Kaciulyte, Juste
    Luridiana, Gianluigi
    Cassetti, Dario
    Barellini, Leonardo
    Neri, Alessandro
    Ribuffo, Diego
    Greco, Manfredi
    Casella, Donato
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (02) : 546 - 556
  • [34] Do Nipple Necrosis Rates Differ in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
    Braun, Sterling E.
    Dreicer, Mollie
    Butterworth, James A.
    Larson, Kelsey E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 4760 - 4766
  • [35] Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Hyungsuk Kim
    Sun-June Park
    Kyong-Je Woo
    Sa Ik Bang
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43 : 313 - 327
  • [36] Nipple-sparing mastectomy through periareolar incision with immediate reconstruction
    Paek, Se Hyun
    Hong, Seung Eun
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    Woo, Joohyun
    Lim, Woosung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 98 (02) : 57 - 61
  • [37] Seldom one and done: Characterizing rates of reoperation with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Hammond, Jacob B.
    Foley, Brittany M.
    Kosiorek, Heidi E.
    Cronin, Patricia A.
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    Casey, William J., III
    Kruger, Erwin A.
    Teven, Chad M.
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (01) : 141 - 146
  • [38] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [39] “Hook Shape” Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series
    Marco Marcasciano
    Federico Lo Torto
    Luca Codolini
    Juste Kaciulyte
    Gianluigi Luridiana
    Dario Cassetti
    Leonardo Barellini
    Alessandro Neri
    Diego Ribuffo
    Manfredi Greco
    Donato Casella
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 546 - 556
  • [40] Comparative Study of Nipple-Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander-Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Kim, Hyungsuk
    Park, Sun-June
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    Bang, Sa Ik
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 43 (02) : 313 - 327