Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique
    Toh, Uhi
    Takenaka, Miki
    Iwakuma, Nobutaka
    Akagi, Yoshito
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (06) : 862 - 871
  • [22] Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in the Ptotic and Non-Ptotic Breast with Staged-Immediate Reconstruction Timing and Pre-Pectoral, Direct-to-Implant Technique
    Duet, Mary
    Pestana, Ivo A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [23] The effect of incision choice on outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction
    Rawlani, Vinay
    Fiuk, Julia
    Johnson, Sarah A.
    Buck, Donald W., II
    Hirsch, Elliot
    Hansen, Nora
    Khan, Seema
    Fine, Neil A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 19 (04): : 129 - 133
  • [24] The Impact of Radiation on Nipple Symmetry After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction An Objective Analysis
    Brown, Ciara A.
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (04) : 379 - 382
  • [25] Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Salibian, Arthur H.
    Harness, Jay K.
    Mowlds, Donald S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [26] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Primary Implant Reconstruction: Surgical and Oncological Outcome of 435 Breast Cancer Patients
    Radovanovic, Zoran
    Ranisavljevic, Milan
    Radovanovic, Dragana
    Vicko, Ferenc
    Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana
    Solajic, Nenad
    BREAST CARE, 2018, 13 (05) : 373 - 378
  • [27] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Reconstruction for Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
    Frasson, Antonio Luiz
    Falcone, Ana Beatriz
    Miranda, Isabela
    Anton de Souza, Alessandra Borba
    Vollbrecht, Betina
    Barbosa, Fernanda
    Rodriguez Martinez Frasson, Monica Adriana
    Lichtenfels, Martina
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2022, 44 (04): : 376 - 384
  • [28] Ischemic Complications After Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction A Critical Analysis
    Razavi, S. Amir
    Hart, Alexandra L.
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S526 - S531
  • [29] Modified goldilocks nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant-based reconstruction: a case report
    Bovill, John D.
    Deldar, Romina
    Wang, Jessica
    Greenwalt, Ian
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (05) : 927 - 931
  • [30] Breast cancer patients' postoperative outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement: a single center experience
    De Luca, Alessandro
    Amabile, Maria Ida
    Frusone, Federico
    Tripodi, Domenico
    Costanzo, Maria Ludovica
    La Torre, Giuseppe
    Marcasciano, Marco
    Lo Torto, Federico
    Monti, Massimo
    Vergine, Massimo
    Ribuffo, Diego
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (07) : 1164 - 1177