Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Shia, Wei-Chung
    Yang, Hui-Ju
    Wu, Hwa-Koon
    Lin, Shih-Lung
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    Huang, Yu-Len
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 231 : 290 - 296
  • [2] Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience
    Sood, Samriti
    Elder, Elisabeth
    French, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (05) : 363 - 367
  • [3] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [4] Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
    Chu, Carrie K.
    Davis, Matthew J.
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Winocour, Sebastian J.
    Losken, Albert
    Carlson, Grant W.
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 33 (04) : 247 - 257
  • [5] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction
    Mori, Hiroki
    Uemura, Noriko
    Okazaki, Mutsumi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Sato, Takanobu
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (05) : 740 - 744
  • [6] Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction - Insights From the One of the Largest Centers in Asia
    Lin, Yu-Meng Claire
    Lui, Su Ann
    Chen, Mei-Yen
    Chou, Yu-Yu
    Cheng, Fiona Tsui-Fen
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2025, 25 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [7] Transaxillary Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Using a Simplified Endoscopic Approach: Indications, Cosmetic Outcomes and Technical Refinements
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Bianchi, Alessandro
    Barone-Adesi, Liliana
    Garganese, Giorgia
    Masetti, Riccardo
    Salgarello, Marzia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (05) : 1466 - 1475
  • [8] Transaxillary Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Using a Simplified Endoscopic Approach: Indications, Cosmetic Outcomes and Technical Refinements
    Giuseppe Visconti
    Gianluca Franceschini
    Alessandro Bianchi
    Liliana Barone-Adesi
    Giorgia Garganese
    Riccardo Masetti
    Marzia Salgarello
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1466 - 1475
  • [9] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction: Cosmetic Outcomes and Technical Refinements
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Barone-Adesi, Liliana
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (05) : 1460 - 1471
  • [10] A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Riggio, Egidio
    Alfieri, Sara
    Toffoli, Elisa
    Borreani, Claudia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 30 - 39