Do Australians trust scientists? It depends on the 'science'

被引:2
作者
Tranter, Bruce [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
Australia; climate change; genetically modified foods; public health; trust in science; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE; POLITICIZATION; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1002/ajs4.263
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Trust in science and scientists underlies public support for social and environmental issues, from taking action on climate change to preventing the spread of viruses. Nationally representative Australian survey data show that public trust in university research is higher than that conducted in other institutions. As sources of information, public trust in scientists is considered across potentially polarising and relatively uncontroversial fields of science, with trust varying considerably according to the type of science examined. Public trust is highest in vaccine science and weather forecasting, and lowest for GM crop science, while climate science and forest management fall in between. Social and political background variables are important correlates of trust in science. Younger, tertiary educated, politically progressive Australians are most trusting. Greens party identifiers and environmentalists are more likely than other respondents to trust all types of science examined here-including GM crop science-while institutional trust is positively associated with trust in scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 837
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do the science on sustainability now
    Nature, 2022, 610 : 605 - 606
  • [42] Do the science on sustainability now
    Bolsonaro, Jair
    NATURE, 2022, 610 (7933) : 605 - 606
  • [43] Trust in science and solution aversion: Attitudes toward adaptation measures predict flood risk perception
    Spaccatini, Federica
    Richetin, Juliette
    Riva, Paolo
    Pancani, Luca
    Ariccio, Silvia
    Sacchi, Simona
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 76
  • [44] A New Dark Age? Truth, Trust, and Environmental Science
    Gundersen, Torbjorn
    Alinejad, Donya
    Branch, T. Y.
    Duffy, Bobby
    Hewlett, Kirstie
    Holst, Cathrine
    Owens, Susan
    Panizza, Folco
    Tellmann, Silje Maria
    van Dijck, Jose
    Baghramian, Maria
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2022, 47 : 5 - 29
  • [45] How do aquatic communities respond to contaminants? It depends on the ecological context
    Clements, William H.
    Hickey, Chris W.
    Kidd, Karen A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2012, 31 (09) : 1932 - 1940
  • [46] Is There a Medialization of Climate Science? Results From a Survey of German Climate Scientists
    Ivanova, Ana
    Schaefer, Mike S.
    Schlichting, Inga
    Schmidt, Andreas
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 35 (05) : 626 - 653
  • [47] Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists
    Post, Senja
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [48] Science, Scientists, and Local Weather: Understanding Mass Perceptions of Global Warming
    Shao, Wanyun
    Garand, James C.
    Keim, Barry D.
    Hamilton, Lawrence C.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2016, 97 (05) : 1023 - 1057
  • [49] Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic
    Kreps, S. E.
    Kriner, D. L.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (43)
  • [50] Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 Orders
    Goldstein, Daniel A. N.
    Wiedemann, Johannes
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2022, 20 (02) : 412 - 438