Do Australians trust scientists? It depends on the 'science'

被引:2
作者
Tranter, Bruce [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
Australia; climate change; genetically modified foods; public health; trust in science; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE; POLITICIZATION; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1002/ajs4.263
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Trust in science and scientists underlies public support for social and environmental issues, from taking action on climate change to preventing the spread of viruses. Nationally representative Australian survey data show that public trust in university research is higher than that conducted in other institutions. As sources of information, public trust in scientists is considered across potentially polarising and relatively uncontroversial fields of science, with trust varying considerably according to the type of science examined. Public trust is highest in vaccine science and weather forecasting, and lowest for GM crop science, while climate science and forest management fall in between. Social and political background variables are important correlates of trust in science. Younger, tertiary educated, politically progressive Australians are most trusting. Greens party identifiers and environmentalists are more likely than other respondents to trust all types of science examined here-including GM crop science-while institutional trust is positively associated with trust in scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 837
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NEW ATLANTIS: BRINGING SCIENCE TO THE THEATRE AND THE THEATRE TO SCIENTISTS
    Buzzard, Sammie
    SHIMA-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO ISLAND CULTURES, 2015, 9 (02): : 103 - 110
  • [32] Scientists' framing of the ocean science-policy interface
    Rudd, Murray A.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 33 : 44 - 60
  • [33] Follow the scientists? How beliefs about the practice of science shaped COVID-19 views
    Safford, Thomas G.
    Whitmore, Emily H.
    Hamilton, Lawrence C.
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (07): : 1 - 19
  • [34] Trust in scientists, researchers, and environmental organizations associated with policy support for energy transition
    Das, Runa R.
    Sussman, Reuven
    Carlson, Richard
    ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2025, 6
  • [35] How do Australians use social media during natural hazards? A survey
    Zander, Kerstin K.
    Sibarani, Rifka
    Lassa, Jonatan
    Duy Nguyen
    Dimmock, April
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 81
  • [36] Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies
    Myers, Teresa A.
    Kotcher, John
    Stenhouse, Neil
    Anderson, Ashley A.
    Maibach, Edward
    Beall, Lindsey
    Leiserowitz, Anthony
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (07) : 843 - 860
  • [37] "Just report the science": How scientists frame their engagement in contested debates over fracking in the Barnett Shale
    Edwards, Michelle L.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 45 : 67 - 74
  • [38] The how and why of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists
    van Vliet, Arnold J. H.
    Bron, Wichertje A.
    Mulder, Sara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 58 (04) : 565 - 577
  • [39] Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists
    Tala, Suvi
    Vesterinen, Veli-Matti
    SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (04) : 435 - 457
  • [40] Corporate Perceptions of Climate Science: The Role of Corporate Environmental Scientists
    Rothenberg, Sandra
    Levy, David L.
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2012, 51 (01) : 31 - 61