Development and psychometric assessment of self-reported patient medication safety scale (SR-PMSS)

被引:1
作者
Qin, Ning [1 ]
Duan, Yinglong [2 ]
Shi, Shuangjiao [3 ]
Li, Xiao [4 ]
Liu, Haoqi [4 ]
Zheng, Feng [3 ]
Zhong, Zhuqing [1 ]
Xiang, Guliang [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Nursing Dept, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Emergency, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Cardiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Nursing, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Nucl Med, Changsha 410013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
medication safety; patient; reliability; scale; self-report; validity; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ERROR; INFORMATION; ADHERENCE; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/20420986231152934
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives:Patient medication safety can affect their clinical outcomes and plays an important role in patient safety management. However, few tools have been developed to assess patient medication safety. This study aimed to develop and validate the self-reported patient medication safety scale (SR-PMSS). Methods:We developed SR-PMSS guided by the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome framework and used psychometric methods to test its validity and reliability. Results:A total of 501 patients with an average age of 56.81 +/- 14.47 were enrolled in this study. The SR-PMSS consisted of 21 items and 5 factors. The content validity was good with item-level content validity index (CVI) > 0.78, average scale-level CVI (S-CVI) > 0.9, and universal agreement S-CVI > 0.8. Exploratory factor analysis extracted a five-factor solution with eigenvalues > 0.1, explaining 67.766% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, acceptable convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for SR-PMSS was 0.929, the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.855, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.978. Conclusions:The SR-PMSS was a valid and reliable instrument with good reliability and validity to evaluate the level of patient medication safety. The target users of the SR-PMSS are all people who are taking or have used prescription medications. The SR-PMSS can be used by healthcare providers in clinical practice and research to identify patients at risk for medication use and intervene with them to reduce adverse medication events and provide support for patient safety management. Plain Language SummarySR-PMSS - a self-reported tool to assess patient medication safetyMedication therapy was the most common and frequent treatment method to prevent and cure diseases. Medication safety issues may occur in the process of medication use. Patient medication safety can affect their clinical outcomes and plays an important role in patient safety management. However, there are few tools to assess patient medication safety currently, and most of them focused on medication safety related to hospitals or healthcare workers. We developed the self-reported patient medication safety scale (SR-PMSS) guided by the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome framework. Then, we conducted a two-round expert consultation, clarity verification, and item simplification to determine the final version of the scale. The SR-PMSS consisted of 21 items and 5 factors and it had good validity and reliability. The target users of the SR-PMSS are all people who are taking or have used prescription medications. Healthcare providers can use the SR-PMSS in clinical practice and research to identify patients at risk for medication use and intervene with them to reduce adverse medication events and provide support for patient safety management.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Carneiro Antonio Vaz, 2003, Rev Port Cardiol, V22, P1513
  • [12] Conflicting Medication Information: Prevalence, Sources, and Relationship to Medication Adherence
    Carpenter, Delesha M.
    Elstad, Emily A.
    Blalock, Susan J.
    DeVellis, Robert F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2014, 19 (01) : 67 - 81
  • [13] Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments
    Clark, Lee Anna
    Watson, David
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (12) : 1412 - 1427
  • [14] The Mood Rhythm Instrument: development and preliminary report
    de Souza, Camila M.
    Carissimi, Alicia
    Costa, Daniele
    Francisco, Ana Paula
    Medeiros, Madeleine S.
    Ilgenfritz, Carlos A.
    de Oliveira, Melissa A.
    Frey, Benicio N.
    Hidalgo, Maria Paz
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2016, 38 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [15] EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03): : 166 - 206
  • [16] Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England
    Elliott, Rachel Ann
    Camacho, Elizabeth
    Jankovic, Dina
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    Faria, Rita
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [17] Medication Errors and Blood Pressure Control Among Patients Managed for Hypertension in Public Ambulatory Care Clinics in Botswana
    Gala, Pooja
    Moshokgo, Veronica
    Seth, Bhavna
    Ramasuana, Kegomoditswe
    Kazadi, Emmanuel
    M'buse, Rudy
    Pharithi, Solomon
    Gobotsamang, Kabelo
    Szymanowski, Paige
    Kerobale, Ruth Olyn
    Balekile, Kelennetse
    Tshimbalanga, Jacques
    Tieng'o, Jane
    Tapela, Neo
    Barak, Tomer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [18] Descriptive analysis of medication errors notified by Primary Health Care: Learning from errors
    Garzon Gonzalez, Gerardo
    Montero Morales, Laura
    de Miguel Garcia, Sara
    Jimenez Dominguez, Cristina
    Dominguez Perez, Nuria
    Mediavilla Herrera, Inmaculada
    [J]. ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2020, 52 (04): : 233 - 239
  • [19] Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting
    Gurwitz, JH
    Field, TS
    Harrold, LR
    Rothschild, J
    Debellis, K
    Seger, AC
    Cadoret, C
    Garber, L
    Kelleher, M
    Bates, DW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (09): : 1107 - 1116
  • [20] Hinton PR, 2014, SPSS explained