Test-Taker Engagement in AI Technology-Mediated Language Assessment

被引:5
作者
Jin, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Fan, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
AI technology-mediated language assessment; Impact of technological innovation; Test-taker engagement; Test-taker perceptions; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1080/15434303.2023.2291731
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In language assessment, AI technology has been incorporated in task design, assessment delivery, automated scoring of performance-based tasks, score reporting, and provision of feedback. AI technology is also used for collecting and analyzing performance data in language assessment validation. Research has been conducted to investigate the efficiency and functionality of assessment technologies, but empirical explorations on test-taker engagement in AI technology-mediated language assessment are remarkably scarce. In this commentary, we first examine the impact of AI technology on test takers, in terms of both the benefits and the challenges that it poses in the critical stages of language assessment development and validation. Next, we propose a conceptual model to facilitate the implementation and evaluation of test-taker engagement in AI technology-mediated language assessment. The model delineates two forms of test-taker engagement: test takers' participation in technology-mediated assessment activities and their perceptions of technological innovations in language assessment. We then review the articles in this special issue based on this model and discuss directions for future research. We conclude by offering some guidance for maximizing test-taker engagement in technological innovations, thereby promoting learning-oriented and equity-minded language assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 500
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Automatic Speaking Assessment of Spontaneous L2 Finnish and Swedish [J].
Al-Ghezi, Ragheb ;
Voskoboinik, Katja ;
Getman, Yaroslav ;
Von Zansen, Anna ;
Kallio, Heini ;
Kurimo, Mikko ;
Huhta, Ari ;
Hilden, Raili .
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 2023, 20 (4-5) :421-444
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Language testing and assessment. Encyclopedia of language and education, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_10
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Research Report (No. RR-08-62), DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2008.TB02148.X
[4]   AI-based online proctoring: a review of the state-of-the-art techniques and open challenges [J].
Aurelia, Sagaya ;
Thanuja, R. ;
Chowdhury, Subrata ;
Hu, Yu-Chen .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 83 (11) :31805-31827
[5]  
Bennett R.E., 1998, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V17, P9, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00631.x, 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1997.tb01734.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.1997.TB01734.X]
[6]   Fears of an AI pioneer [J].
Bohannon, John .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6245) :252-252
[7]  
Cheng L., 2010, English language assessment and the Chinese learner
[8]  
Chukharev-Hudilainen E., 2021, ETS Research Report Series, ets2, P12319, DOI DOI 10.1002/ETS2.12319
[9]  
Coniam D., 2014, ENGLISH LANGUAGE ED
[10]   Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke logging [J].
Conijn, Rianne ;
Cook, Christine ;
van Zaanen, Menno ;
Van Waes, Luuk .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (04) :835-866