Administrative monopoly regulation and corporate tax avoidance- evidence from China

被引:14
作者
Zhang, Zili [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zeyu [3 ]
Si, Yanwu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tianyang [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Key Res Ctr Philosophy & Social Sci Zhejiang Prov, Inst Local Finance Res, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Fair competition review system; Administrative monopoly regulation; Corporate tax avoidance; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104402
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly regulation on corporate tax avoidance. Using the difference-in-difference (DID) methodology and data from A-share listed companies for the period 2012-2020, we find that China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) significantly reduces tax avoidance by administrative monopolies. Possible channels include increasing analyst attention, improving quality of corporate disclosure, and increasing management ownership. The enhanced external monitoring and increased internal incentives resulting from the implementation of the FCRS reduce the tax avoidance impulse of administrative monopolies. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the dampening effect of the FCRS on tax avoidance is more pronounced among firms with strong short-term solvency, weak financing constraints, and defect-free internal controls.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The incentives for tax planning [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Blouin, Jennifer L. ;
Larcker, David F. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2) :391-411
[2]   Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence [J].
Atwood, T. J. ;
Drake, Michael S. ;
Myers, James N. ;
Myers, Linda A. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (06) :1831-1860
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls [J].
Bauer, Andrew M. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 33 (02) :449-486
[5]   Financial constraints and share repurchases [J].
Chen, Sheng-Syan ;
Wang, Yanzhi .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 105 (02) :311-331
[6]   Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives [J].
Desai, MA ;
Dharmapala, D .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 79 (01) :145-179
[7]   CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE AND FIRM VALUE [J].
Desai, Mihir A. ;
Dharmapala, Dhammika .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2009, 91 (03) :537-546
[8]   Long-run corporate tax avoidance [J].
Dyreng, Scott D. ;
Hanlon, Michelle ;
Maydew, Edward L. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (01) :61-82
[9]   The Effect of Corporate Tax Avoidance on the Cost of Equity [J].
Goh, Beng Wee ;
Lee, Jimmy ;
Lim, Chee Yeow ;
Shevlin, Terry .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 91 (06) :1647-1670
[10]   An Analysis of Multiple Consecutive Years of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control [J].
Gordon, Lawrence A. ;
Wilford, Amanda L. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (06) :2027-2060